Scholarlink

<p>The analysis of citation patterns in the scholarly landscape of data literacy using data collected from Scopus and analysed using Vosviewer reveals significant findings. Initially, 997 documents were identified, averaging 52 per year, but a criterion of 10 citations per document narrowed down the subset to 205 documents, indicating substantial scholarly attention. Among these, only 81 interconnected documents were found, suggesting their pivotal role in shaping discourse. Notably, Prado’s (2013) work on integrating data literacy into education emerged as highly influential. Key journals and conference proceedings such as the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series and Teachers College Record were identified as influential sources. Co-citation analysis highlighted notable authors like Mandinach, d’Ignazio, and Koltay, underlining their contributions. Seminal works by Mandinach and Gummer on educator preparation underscored the interdisciplinary nature of data literacy. Implications for policy and practice include advocating for integrating data literacy into curricula, designing educator training programs, promoting interdisciplinary collaboration, and supporting open access to literature. However, potential biases and dataset limitations must be acknowledged in interpreting the findings.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Citation analysis of global research on data literacy

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年2月15日

查看全文
  • Williams Ezinwa Nwagwu

摘要

The analysis of citation patterns in the scholarly landscape of data literacy using data collected from Scopus and analysed using Vosviewer reveals significant findings. Initially, 997 documents were identified, averaging 52 per year, but a criterion of 10 citations per document narrowed down the subset to 205 documents, indicating substantial scholarly attention. Among these, only 81 interconnected documents were found, suggesting their pivotal role in shaping discourse. Notably, Prado’s (2013) work on integrating data literacy into education emerged as highly influential. Key journals and conference proceedings such as the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series and Teachers College Record were identified as influential sources. Co-citation analysis highlighted notable authors like Mandinach, d’Ignazio, and Koltay, underlining their contributions. Seminal works by Mandinach and Gummer on educator preparation underscored the interdisciplinary nature of data literacy. Implications for policy and practice include advocating for integrating data literacy into curricula, designing educator training programs, promoting interdisciplinary collaboration, and supporting open access to literature. However, potential biases and dataset limitations must be acknowledged in interpreting the findings.