<p>VANETs are a type of mobile ad-hoc network that are used in a wide variety of applications. Establishing reliable communication, especially in safety and emergency applications, remains a significant challenge for VANETs. Applying trust management has emerged as a crucial approach to address this challenge. This paper has proposed a cooperation-based RSU-assisted trust management model (CTVAN), which is easily integrated with other protocols for establishing reliable communication in VANETs. In CTVAN, vehicles observe the cooperation in forwarding (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10586_2024_4936_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="29" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\:CF\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) of other vehicles to calculate direct trusts of vehicles and then report their observations to RSUs, where indirect trusts of vehicles are calculated and maintained in the distributed ledger of a blockchain. CTVAN incorporates an effective monitoring process to evaluate the cooperation of vehicles in packet forwarding, which detects forwarding-related attacks and retransmits packets that may have failed to be correctly forwarded. It encourages and evaluates vehicle cooperation in reporting (<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10586_2024_4936_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="31" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\:CR\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), which can significantly improve the accuracy of trust management. It utilizes a pair-reporting mechanism that assesses the reports against reporting-related attacks and incorporates the evaluation results into the indirect trust calculation. The simulation results demonstrated significant improvements in the trust management of the TGRV protocol when integrated with CTVAN for trust management and communication establishment. In an urban scenario, there was a notable 5.5% increase in the packet delivery ratio and a substantial 17% reduction in end-to-end delay. Furthermore, the results indicate that TGRV with CTVAN outperforms the RTRV protocol. The cost analysis showed that memory, communication, and computational overheads of CTVAN are acceptable. Also, the security analysis showed that CTVAN is resistant and resilient to important trust-based attacks.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

CTVAN: a cooperation-based RSU-assisted trust management model for reliable communication in VANETs

  • Saeed Shokrollahi,
  • Mahtab Dehghan

摘要

VANETs are a type of mobile ad-hoc network that are used in a wide variety of applications. Establishing reliable communication, especially in safety and emergency applications, remains a significant challenge for VANETs. Applying trust management has emerged as a crucial approach to address this challenge. This paper has proposed a cooperation-based RSU-assisted trust management model (CTVAN), which is easily integrated with other protocols for establishing reliable communication in VANETs. In CTVAN, vehicles observe the cooperation in forwarding ( \(\:CF\) ) of other vehicles to calculate direct trusts of vehicles and then report their observations to RSUs, where indirect trusts of vehicles are calculated and maintained in the distributed ledger of a blockchain. CTVAN incorporates an effective monitoring process to evaluate the cooperation of vehicles in packet forwarding, which detects forwarding-related attacks and retransmits packets that may have failed to be correctly forwarded. It encourages and evaluates vehicle cooperation in reporting ( \(\:CR\) ), which can significantly improve the accuracy of trust management. It utilizes a pair-reporting mechanism that assesses the reports against reporting-related attacks and incorporates the evaluation results into the indirect trust calculation. The simulation results demonstrated significant improvements in the trust management of the TGRV protocol when integrated with CTVAN for trust management and communication establishment. In an urban scenario, there was a notable 5.5% increase in the packet delivery ratio and a substantial 17% reduction in end-to-end delay. Furthermore, the results indicate that TGRV with CTVAN outperforms the RTRV protocol. The cost analysis showed that memory, communication, and computational overheads of CTVAN are acceptable. Also, the security analysis showed that CTVAN is resistant and resilient to important trust-based attacks.