<p>A number of studies have demonstrated a tendency for Global Climate Models (GCMs) to underestimate multiyear precipitation variability across many regions of the globe. We present the Multiyear Precipitation Variability Bias Correction (MPVBC) method to provide more realistic multiyear extreme precipitation scenarios. Our case study includes the basins encompassing the portion of the New York City water supply system located west of the Hudson River, which historically provide ninety percent of the City’s water. In this region, multiyear precipitation variability, defined as the range in precipitation, is underestimated in GCMs by factors between approximately 1.5 and 7 for 1–20&#xa0;year durations, with median GCMs underestimating variability by a factor of between two and three. The MPVBC correction changes median GCM precipitation magnitude during the most extreme dry and wet events by 10% to 25%. These results include GCMs that have been subjected to widely-used downscaling and/or bias correction techniques at annual or sub-annual timescales. This suggests that GCM-derived future multiyear extreme precipitation scenarios may not represent the full range of likely extreme scenarios, potentially hindering evaluations of water supply system resiliency, or even worse, giving water managers unrealistic complacency.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Characterizing and correcting for global climate models’ biases in multiyear extreme precipitation scenarios

  • Allan Frei,
  • Rakesh Gelda,
  • Rajith Mukundan

摘要

A number of studies have demonstrated a tendency for Global Climate Models (GCMs) to underestimate multiyear precipitation variability across many regions of the globe. We present the Multiyear Precipitation Variability Bias Correction (MPVBC) method to provide more realistic multiyear extreme precipitation scenarios. Our case study includes the basins encompassing the portion of the New York City water supply system located west of the Hudson River, which historically provide ninety percent of the City’s water. In this region, multiyear precipitation variability, defined as the range in precipitation, is underestimated in GCMs by factors between approximately 1.5 and 7 for 1–20 year durations, with median GCMs underestimating variability by a factor of between two and three. The MPVBC correction changes median GCM precipitation magnitude during the most extreme dry and wet events by 10% to 25%. These results include GCMs that have been subjected to widely-used downscaling and/or bias correction techniques at annual or sub-annual timescales. This suggests that GCM-derived future multiyear extreme precipitation scenarios may not represent the full range of likely extreme scenarios, potentially hindering evaluations of water supply system resiliency, or even worse, giving water managers unrealistic complacency.