Background <p>Adolescent mental health reflects the interplay of risk and protective factors, yet the structural organization linking these components remains insufficiently understood.</p> Objective <p>This study used network analysis to map the structural organization of risk and protective factors and to test whether self-disgust occupies a bridging position between these subsystems.</p> Methods <p>A total of 1,245 Chinese adolescents (ages 12–18) completed self-report measures of neuroticism, self-esteem, self-concept clarity, core self-evaluation, self-disgust, cognitive reappraisal, anxiety, and depression. A regularized partial correlation network was estimated, followed by strength and bridge centrality analyses and network comparisons across gender and school level (junior vs. senior high).</p> Results <p>Neuroticism showed the highest strength centrality. Self-disgust showed the highest bridge centrality and was conditionally associated with nodes from both the risk community (neuroticism, anxiety, depression) and the protective community (self-esteem, core self-evaluation, self-concept clarity). Protective factors formed a tightly interconnected subsystem. Subgroup analyses indicated higher bridge centrality of self-disgust in males and higher strength centrality of cognitive reappraisal in senior high school students.</p> Conclusions <p>Self-disgust occupies a central bridging position between dispositional risk and protective self-resources within this cross-sectional adolescent network. These findings highlight self-disgust as a structurally prominent construct for future longitudinal and experimental testing of developmental and causal hypotheses regarding adolescent affective symptoms.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A Network Analysis of Risk and Protective Factors in Adolescent Affective Disorders

  • Liming Yue,
  • Yang Cui,
  • Xiangping Gao

摘要

Background

Adolescent mental health reflects the interplay of risk and protective factors, yet the structural organization linking these components remains insufficiently understood.

Objective

This study used network analysis to map the structural organization of risk and protective factors and to test whether self-disgust occupies a bridging position between these subsystems.

Methods

A total of 1,245 Chinese adolescents (ages 12–18) completed self-report measures of neuroticism, self-esteem, self-concept clarity, core self-evaluation, self-disgust, cognitive reappraisal, anxiety, and depression. A regularized partial correlation network was estimated, followed by strength and bridge centrality analyses and network comparisons across gender and school level (junior vs. senior high).

Results

Neuroticism showed the highest strength centrality. Self-disgust showed the highest bridge centrality and was conditionally associated with nodes from both the risk community (neuroticism, anxiety, depression) and the protective community (self-esteem, core self-evaluation, self-concept clarity). Protective factors formed a tightly interconnected subsystem. Subgroup analyses indicated higher bridge centrality of self-disgust in males and higher strength centrality of cognitive reappraisal in senior high school students.

Conclusions

Self-disgust occupies a central bridging position between dispositional risk and protective self-resources within this cross-sectional adolescent network. These findings highlight self-disgust as a structurally prominent construct for future longitudinal and experimental testing of developmental and causal hypotheses regarding adolescent affective symptoms.