Scholarlink

<p>To assess differences and correlations between left ventricular myocardial strain measurements derived from cardiac CT (CCT) and cardiac MR (CMR) in patients with ischemic (IHD) and non-ischemic heart disease (NIHD). This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent both full cardiac cycle CCT and CMR within 3 months. Global longitudinal (GLS), radial (GRS), and circumferential strain (GCS) were measured for both CCT and CMR. The mean difference with limits of agreement (LOA) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. A prespecified margin of ± 1.5%, based on clinically acceptable differences, was used as a reference for assessing agreement. Sixty-three patients (mean age 68 ± 14 years; 70% male; 48% NIHD) were included. GLS and GCS from CCT showed minimal bias and good correlation with CMR (GLS, difference, -1.1% [LOA, -4.6%–2.4%]; <i>r</i> = 0.89 [95% CI 0.83–0.93]; GCS, difference, -1.2% [LOA, -7.4%–4.9%]; <i>r</i> = 0.78 [95% CI 0.66–0.86]). GRS from CCT showed slight overestimation compared to CMR (difference, 2.8% [LOA, -12.7%–18.3%]; <i>r</i> = 0.70 [95% CI 0.55–0.81]). The small bias in GLS was consistent between IHD and NIHD subgroups (-2.8% vs. 0.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.694), while GRS and GCS differences were more pronounced in the IHD subgroup (GRS, 5.2% vs. 0.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.014; GCS, -2.8% vs. 0.5%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). GLS and GCS from CCT showed good agreement with CMR, supporting their clinical feasibility. However, GRS and GCS measurements may be influenced by imaging protocols and disease backgrounds, necessitating standardized protocols for clinical application.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Assessment of agreement of left ventricular myocardial strain derived from cardiac computed tomography with cardiac magnetic resonance

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月23日

查看全文
  • Hidenobu Takagi,
  • Shin Chibana,
  • Jingyi Xing,
  • Kei Takase,
  • Hideki Ota

摘要

To assess differences and correlations between left ventricular myocardial strain measurements derived from cardiac CT (CCT) and cardiac MR (CMR) in patients with ischemic (IHD) and non-ischemic heart disease (NIHD). This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent both full cardiac cycle CCT and CMR within 3 months. Global longitudinal (GLS), radial (GRS), and circumferential strain (GCS) were measured for both CCT and CMR. The mean difference with limits of agreement (LOA) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. A prespecified margin of ± 1.5%, based on clinically acceptable differences, was used as a reference for assessing agreement. Sixty-three patients (mean age 68 ± 14 years; 70% male; 48% NIHD) were included. GLS and GCS from CCT showed minimal bias and good correlation with CMR (GLS, difference, -1.1% [LOA, -4.6%–2.4%]; r = 0.89 [95% CI 0.83–0.93]; GCS, difference, -1.2% [LOA, -7.4%–4.9%]; r = 0.78 [95% CI 0.66–0.86]). GRS from CCT showed slight overestimation compared to CMR (difference, 2.8% [LOA, -12.7%–18.3%]; r = 0.70 [95% CI 0.55–0.81]). The small bias in GLS was consistent between IHD and NIHD subgroups (-2.8% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.694), while GRS and GCS differences were more pronounced in the IHD subgroup (GRS, 5.2% vs. 0.1%, p = 0.014; GCS, -2.8% vs. 0.5%, p < 0.001). GLS and GCS from CCT showed good agreement with CMR, supporting their clinical feasibility. However, GRS and GCS measurements may be influenced by imaging protocols and disease backgrounds, necessitating standardized protocols for clinical application.