Background <p>Fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) are recommended for routine colorectal cancer (CRC) screening because they are cost-effective, non-invasive, and convenient. Pharmacy-based CRC screening using FIT kits could be effective to improve screening rates, particularly in medically underserved communities. However, data on follow-up procedures and barriers after positive FIT results in this context remain sparse.</p> Methods <p>We conducted a national survey of 1,045 US adults aged 45–75 to assess preferences for follow-up care in a pharmacy-based CRC screening program we call PharmFIT™ and identify perceived barriers to follow-up colonoscopy after positive FIT results. We evaluated patient preferences and barriers using descriptive statistics. We used multinomial logistic regressions to identify correlates of patient preferences for follow-up and multiple logistic regressions to identify correlates of perceived psychosocial and structural barriers to follow-up colonoscopy.</p> Results <p>Participants showed a strong preference for digital communication for negative FIT results and reminders, but favored direct, interpersonal communication from healthcare providers for positive results and follow-up. Psychosocial barriers, such as fear of colonoscopy or cancer diagnosis, were more prevalent than structural barriers like cost and transportation. Older adults, those with a regular healthcare provider, and higher-income individuals were less likely to report barriers, while non-white and Medicaid patients showed lower preferences for automated notifications.</p> Conclusion <p>PharmFIT should use tailored, multimodal communication strategies to address patient preferences and include strategies, like patient navigation, to address potential barriers to follow-up colonoscopy. This study reinforces the potential of pharmacy-based CRC screening programs to increase screening access and opportunities, particularly in medically underserved communities.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Patient preferences and perceived barriers to follow-up care in a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program: a national survey

  • Jessie Schwartz,
  • Mary Wangen,
  • Olufeyisayo O. Odebunmi,
  • Austin Waters,
  • Renée Ferrari,
  • Macary Marciniak,
  • Alison T. Brenner,
  • Stephanie B. Wheeler,
  • Parth D. Shah

摘要

Background

Fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) are recommended for routine colorectal cancer (CRC) screening because they are cost-effective, non-invasive, and convenient. Pharmacy-based CRC screening using FIT kits could be effective to improve screening rates, particularly in medically underserved communities. However, data on follow-up procedures and barriers after positive FIT results in this context remain sparse.

Methods

We conducted a national survey of 1,045 US adults aged 45–75 to assess preferences for follow-up care in a pharmacy-based CRC screening program we call PharmFIT™ and identify perceived barriers to follow-up colonoscopy after positive FIT results. We evaluated patient preferences and barriers using descriptive statistics. We used multinomial logistic regressions to identify correlates of patient preferences for follow-up and multiple logistic regressions to identify correlates of perceived psychosocial and structural barriers to follow-up colonoscopy.

Results

Participants showed a strong preference for digital communication for negative FIT results and reminders, but favored direct, interpersonal communication from healthcare providers for positive results and follow-up. Psychosocial barriers, such as fear of colonoscopy or cancer diagnosis, were more prevalent than structural barriers like cost and transportation. Older adults, those with a regular healthcare provider, and higher-income individuals were less likely to report barriers, while non-white and Medicaid patients showed lower preferences for automated notifications.

Conclusion

PharmFIT should use tailored, multimodal communication strategies to address patient preferences and include strategies, like patient navigation, to address potential barriers to follow-up colonoscopy. This study reinforces the potential of pharmacy-based CRC screening programs to increase screening access and opportunities, particularly in medically underserved communities.