Scholarlink

<p>Based on a longitudinal case study of Elon Musk’s sociopolitical activism (2013–2022), we examine the characteristics of chief executive officer (CEO) activism that may enable a CEO to gain legitimacy in an ideologically polarized news media environment. Our study uncovered that, across three phases, Musk’s activism only yielded legitimacy across polarized liberal and conservative news media outlets in the United States in Episode II (2016–2019), whereas in Episodes I (2013–2015) and III (2020–2022), his activism was only aligned with the ideologies and values of one side of the polarized audience (with liberal audiences in Episode I and with conservative audiences in Episode III) but misaligned with the other side. Utilizing inductive theory building and drawing from research on robust action, we develop new theory that distinguishes the influence of what we refer to as <i>robust</i> versus <i>non-robust</i> CEO activism on polarized audiences. Robust CEO activism is constituted by multivocal and diplomatic types of activism, whereas non-robust activism entails univocal and provocative activism. We suggest that robust (rather than non-robust) CEO activism induces ideologically polarized audiences to evaluate a corporate leader coherently and favorably based on a legitimation mechanism which we refer to as two-sided alignment. Our study makes important contributions to different streams of literature and develops normative implications for political conceptions of responsible and ethical leadership.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Robust CEO Activism and Two-Sided Alignment: How Elon Musk Gained (and Lost) Legitimacy in the Polarized U.S. News Media Landscape

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月16日

查看全文
  • Dorothee Maria Winkler,
  • Florian Überbacher,
  • Andreas Georg Scherer

摘要

Based on a longitudinal case study of Elon Musk’s sociopolitical activism (2013–2022), we examine the characteristics of chief executive officer (CEO) activism that may enable a CEO to gain legitimacy in an ideologically polarized news media environment. Our study uncovered that, across three phases, Musk’s activism only yielded legitimacy across polarized liberal and conservative news media outlets in the United States in Episode II (2016–2019), whereas in Episodes I (2013–2015) and III (2020–2022), his activism was only aligned with the ideologies and values of one side of the polarized audience (with liberal audiences in Episode I and with conservative audiences in Episode III) but misaligned with the other side. Utilizing inductive theory building and drawing from research on robust action, we develop new theory that distinguishes the influence of what we refer to as robust versus non-robust CEO activism on polarized audiences. Robust CEO activism is constituted by multivocal and diplomatic types of activism, whereas non-robust activism entails univocal and provocative activism. We suggest that robust (rather than non-robust) CEO activism induces ideologically polarized audiences to evaluate a corporate leader coherently and favorably based on a legitimation mechanism which we refer to as two-sided alignment. Our study makes important contributions to different streams of literature and develops normative implications for political conceptions of responsible and ethical leadership.