Scholarlink

<p>Electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG), two of the most widely used tools for studying human brain dynamics, are thought to have varying spatial resolutions. Here, we simultaneously recorded EEG and MEG data from 14 participants to directly compare their sensitivities — at both the sensor and source levels — to the auditory Mismatch Negativity (MMN in EEG and MMNm in MEG) elicited by pitch deviants. At the sensor level, we observed that negative components emerged in early (100–190 ms) and late (260–420 ms) latency windows. These responses displayed a fronto-central distribution in EEG and a centro-parietal distribution in MEG. MEG also yielded larger effect sizes than EEG, likely reflecting differences in signal-to-noise ratio between MEG and EEG. At the source level, our findings support the involvement of a fronto-temporal auditory MMN network. Both EEG and MEG identified generators in the superior temporal gyrus, Heschl’s gyrus, interior frontal gyrus, and insular regions. Notably, EEG source localization revealed additional generators in the left superior temporal sulcus not detected by MEG, whereas MEG identified late components generators in the right hemisphere that were not observed with EEG. Taken together, these results suggest that EEG and MEG may provide complementary perspectives on auditory processing. However, given the inherent complexity of comparing data acquired with different methodologies and the limited sample size, our conclusions should be regarded as preliminary.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Pre-attentive Pitch Processing of Harmonic Complex Sounds at Sensor and Source Levels: Comparing Simultaneously Recorded EEG and MEG Data

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月27日

查看全文
  • Talya C. Inbar,
  • Jean-Michel Badier,
  • Christian Bénar,
  • Khoubeib Kanzari,
  • Mireille Besson,
  • Valérie Chanoine

摘要

Electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG), two of the most widely used tools for studying human brain dynamics, are thought to have varying spatial resolutions. Here, we simultaneously recorded EEG and MEG data from 14 participants to directly compare their sensitivities — at both the sensor and source levels — to the auditory Mismatch Negativity (MMN in EEG and MMNm in MEG) elicited by pitch deviants. At the sensor level, we observed that negative components emerged in early (100–190 ms) and late (260–420 ms) latency windows. These responses displayed a fronto-central distribution in EEG and a centro-parietal distribution in MEG. MEG also yielded larger effect sizes than EEG, likely reflecting differences in signal-to-noise ratio between MEG and EEG. At the source level, our findings support the involvement of a fronto-temporal auditory MMN network. Both EEG and MEG identified generators in the superior temporal gyrus, Heschl’s gyrus, interior frontal gyrus, and insular regions. Notably, EEG source localization revealed additional generators in the left superior temporal sulcus not detected by MEG, whereas MEG identified late components generators in the right hemisphere that were not observed with EEG. Taken together, these results suggest that EEG and MEG may provide complementary perspectives on auditory processing. However, given the inherent complexity of comparing data acquired with different methodologies and the limited sample size, our conclusions should be regarded as preliminary.