<p>The fast reconstruction of a bandlimited function from its sample data is an essential problem in signal processing. In this paper, we consider the widely used Gaussian regularized Shannon sampling formula in comparison to regularized Shannon sampling formulas employing alternative window functions, such as the <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\sinh \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>sinh</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-type window function and the continuous Kaiser–Bessel window function. It is shown that the approximation errors of these regularized Shannon sampling formulas possess an exponential decay with respect to the truncation parameter. The main focus of this work is to address minor gaps in the preceding papers [<CitationRef CitationID="CR13">13</CitationRef>, <CitationRef CitationID="CR14">14</CitationRef>] and rigorously prove assumptions that were previously based solely on numerical tests. In doing so, we demonstrate that the <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\sinh \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>sinh</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-type regularized Shannon sampling formula has the same exponential decay as the continuous Kaiser–Bessel regularized Shannon sampling formula, but both have twice the exponential decay of the Gaussian regularized Shannon sampling formula. Additionally, numerical experiments illustrate the theoretical results.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Some remarks on regularized Shannon sampling formulas

  • Melanie Kircheis,
  • Daniel Potts,
  • Manfred Tasche

摘要

The fast reconstruction of a bandlimited function from its sample data is an essential problem in signal processing. In this paper, we consider the widely used Gaussian regularized Shannon sampling formula in comparison to regularized Shannon sampling formulas employing alternative window functions, such as the \(\sinh \) sinh -type window function and the continuous Kaiser–Bessel window function. It is shown that the approximation errors of these regularized Shannon sampling formulas possess an exponential decay with respect to the truncation parameter. The main focus of this work is to address minor gaps in the preceding papers [13, 14] and rigorously prove assumptions that were previously based solely on numerical tests. In doing so, we demonstrate that the \(\sinh \) sinh -type regularized Shannon sampling formula has the same exponential decay as the continuous Kaiser–Bessel regularized Shannon sampling formula, but both have twice the exponential decay of the Gaussian regularized Shannon sampling formula. Additionally, numerical experiments illustrate the theoretical results.