<p>Microplastic pollution and biological invasions are converging in human-modified landscapes, yet their interactive effects remain poorly understood. Current research emphasizes chemical toxicity, but microplastics also function as particulate stressors that physically restructure soil environments. I propose the Triple-Filter Hypothesis, a framework reconceptualizing microplastics as contemporary biophysical filters that can reshape invasion trajectories through three mechanistic pathways. The Dispersal Filter posits that physical adhesion between propagules and plastic particles creates altered dispersal associations favoring species with adhesive seed surfaces. The Abiotic Filter proposes that soil structural modification imposes selection for flexible root architectures and stress-tolerant physiologies. The Biotic Filter hypothesizes that disruption of plant–soil–microbiome feedbacks differentially affects species depending on their mycorrhizal dependencies. Current evidence provides strongest support for abiotic mechanisms, while dispersal and biotic pathways remain largely untested. I identify three methodological limitations hindering progress: taxonomic parochialism, phylogenetic confounding, and ecologically unrealistic experimental concentrations. Advancing this field requires shifting from phenomenological description toward mechanistic hypothesis testing through biophysical validation, phylogenetically controlled designs, and multi-stressor experiments under field-realistic conditions. The Triple-Filter Hypothesis provides a testable structure for evaluating whether microplastics function as ecological filters in contemporary Anthropocene ecosystems.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Beyond toxicity: microplastics as contemporary biophysical filters in plant invasion dynamics

  • Chanchan Xu

摘要

Microplastic pollution and biological invasions are converging in human-modified landscapes, yet their interactive effects remain poorly understood. Current research emphasizes chemical toxicity, but microplastics also function as particulate stressors that physically restructure soil environments. I propose the Triple-Filter Hypothesis, a framework reconceptualizing microplastics as contemporary biophysical filters that can reshape invasion trajectories through three mechanistic pathways. The Dispersal Filter posits that physical adhesion between propagules and plastic particles creates altered dispersal associations favoring species with adhesive seed surfaces. The Abiotic Filter proposes that soil structural modification imposes selection for flexible root architectures and stress-tolerant physiologies. The Biotic Filter hypothesizes that disruption of plant–soil–microbiome feedbacks differentially affects species depending on their mycorrhizal dependencies. Current evidence provides strongest support for abiotic mechanisms, while dispersal and biotic pathways remain largely untested. I identify three methodological limitations hindering progress: taxonomic parochialism, phylogenetic confounding, and ecologically unrealistic experimental concentrations. Advancing this field requires shifting from phenomenological description toward mechanistic hypothesis testing through biophysical validation, phylogenetically controlled designs, and multi-stressor experiments under field-realistic conditions. The Triple-Filter Hypothesis provides a testable structure for evaluating whether microplastics function as ecological filters in contemporary Anthropocene ecosystems.