<p>Organisms deploy chemical defenses against pathogens and competitors, often resulting in a coevolutionary arms race. When introduced into new environments, non-native species may possess ‘novel weapons’ against which native species have not evolved resistance. Ants use antifungal secretions and microbial symbionts to defend against pathogens, but their broader effects on soil fungi are less understood. We tested whether the invasive ant <i>Myrmica rubra</i> suppressed native fungi more strongly than the native ant <i>Aphaenogaster picea</i> using laboratory assays in which colonies of each species were exposed to agar plates inoculated with a native saprotroph, <i>Absidia</i> sp. Across high- and low-resource replicates, <i>A. picea</i> had no effect on <i>Absidia</i> growth relative to controls, whereas <i>M. rubra</i> reduced fungal cover, supporting the prediction that <i>M. rubra</i> ants exert stronger antifungal effects. Moreover, <i>M. rubra</i> facilitated non-target fungi colonization, including <i>Aspergillus</i>, <i>Clonostachys</i> and <i>Simplicillium</i> species. Finally, phylogenetic analysis confirmed that <i>M. rubra</i> restructured fungal communities into distinct fungal assemblages. These results suggest that invasive ants may suppress native fungi while facilitating tolerant or self-benefiting fungi, potentially reinforcing their ecological success. These findings highlight microbial restructuring as a consequence of ant invasion.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Invasive ants suppress a native fungus but restructure fungal communities and increase richness

  • Chloe Mokadam,
  • Olga Novikova,
  • Robert Warren

摘要

Organisms deploy chemical defenses against pathogens and competitors, often resulting in a coevolutionary arms race. When introduced into new environments, non-native species may possess ‘novel weapons’ against which native species have not evolved resistance. Ants use antifungal secretions and microbial symbionts to defend against pathogens, but their broader effects on soil fungi are less understood. We tested whether the invasive ant Myrmica rubra suppressed native fungi more strongly than the native ant Aphaenogaster picea using laboratory assays in which colonies of each species were exposed to agar plates inoculated with a native saprotroph, Absidia sp. Across high- and low-resource replicates, A. picea had no effect on Absidia growth relative to controls, whereas M. rubra reduced fungal cover, supporting the prediction that M. rubra ants exert stronger antifungal effects. Moreover, M. rubra facilitated non-target fungi colonization, including Aspergillus, Clonostachys and Simplicillium species. Finally, phylogenetic analysis confirmed that M. rubra restructured fungal communities into distinct fungal assemblages. These results suggest that invasive ants may suppress native fungi while facilitating tolerant or self-benefiting fungi, potentially reinforcing their ecological success. These findings highlight microbial restructuring as a consequence of ant invasion.