<p>The resilience of school buildings in high seismic regions is widely emphasised and evaluated. However such resilience in low-to-medium seismic regions are generally overlooked due to the lower probability of occurrence and low-to-medium intensities expected. Nonetheless, nominal seismic provisions should be provided for the life safety of pupils occupying these school buildings. Therefore, this study was focused on assessing the level of seismic resilience of school buildings in low-to-medium seismic regions, where the archetypal school buildings in Sri Lanka and the seismic demand in the country were taken as the case study. A framework to quantify resilience, incorporating social recovery aspects, was adopted to evaluate the seismic resilience. The resilience of the same archetypal school buildings subjected to different nominal retrofitting methods was also assessed to verify the improvement in resilience compared to un-retrofitted buildings. The epistemic and aleatory uncertainties were incorporated by using 25 different recorded seismic accelerograms and Monte-Carlo simulation of material properties (twenty sets of randomised values), respectively; with 500 combinations (aleatoric and epistemic) being analysed for each building type considered. Seismic resilience indices (<i>RIs</i>) obtained indicate that the school buildings with retrofitted configurations are certainly better than un-retrofitted ones, especially for higher hazard levels. Increases in the <i>RIs</i> are in the range of 36.6–91.2% for the highest hazard level. Sensitivity analyses were also carried out to ascertain parameter influence on <i>RIs</i>. The proposed nominal retrofitting solutions for these school building archetypes generate adequate resilience against the seismic hazards demarcated for the country.</p>