<p>This paper challenges the view that scientific culture promotes democracy while religious culture threatens it. Drawing on Jürgen Habermas’s account of the “sacred complex” and his theory of deliberative democracy, the paper argues that religion and science are co-evolving responses to the cognitive and social demands of human life. Religious contributions, when open to deliberation, serve vital democratic functions. The liberal state, although committed to worldview neutrality and equal participation, must therefore include religious reasoning in public deliberation to sustain the symbolic reproduction of the lifeworld and the legitimacy of democratic will-formation.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Scientific Culture, Religious Culture, and the Democratic Ideal

  • Yiftach Fehige

摘要

This paper challenges the view that scientific culture promotes democracy while religious culture threatens it. Drawing on Jürgen Habermas’s account of the “sacred complex” and his theory of deliberative democracy, the paper argues that religion and science are co-evolving responses to the cognitive and social demands of human life. Religious contributions, when open to deliberation, serve vital democratic functions. The liberal state, although committed to worldview neutrality and equal participation, must therefore include religious reasoning in public deliberation to sustain the symbolic reproduction of the lifeworld and the legitimacy of democratic will-formation.