This study presents a comparative analysis of two modified theories of gravity, $f(R,T)$ and $f(\mathcal{T})$ , within the framework of a locally rotationally symmetric Bianchi type-I spacetime. The primary objective is to explore the role of curvature-matter coupling and torsional dynamics in explaining the universe’s late-time acceleration without invoking a cosmological constant. To solve the highly nonlinear field equations, a hyperbolic sine scale factor and a shear-expansion proportionality condition are employed. The resulting models are constrained using observational Hubble parameter data via a $\chi ^{2}$ minimization technique. Key cosmological quantities, including energy density, pressure, and the equation of state (EoS) parameter, are analyzed alongside geometrical diagnostics such as the $\operatorname{Om}(z)$ and statefinder parameters. Statistical tools like the Akaike and Bayesian information criteria (AIC/BIC) are used to assess model performance relative to $\Lambda$ CDM. Results show that both models capture the transition from decelerated to accelerated expansion, with the $f(\mathcal{T})$ model exhibiting a more dynamic dark energy behavior and an earlier onset of acceleration. These findings suggest that torsional-based gravity may provide a geometrically motivated and observationally consistent alternative to standard cosmology.