<p>Environmental pollution represents a significant negative externality for society by imposing substantial costs on it. By incentivizing eco-friendly production, one can mitigate these costs and promote sustainable development. Given this framework, the present article formulates and solves a multi-stage game-theoretical pricing model involving two firms: one commercializes a non-green product; the other one is involved in the production of a green product. The model also involves the State, which can influence the two firms through a dual mechanism based on imposing an excise duty and promoting an advertising campaign. Firms’ profits and social welfare at the subgame perfect equilibrium are obtained in closed form, and their dependence on exogenous parameters is analyzed both theoretically and numerically. An interesting outcome of our analysis is that, in certain cases, the excise duty is found to be negative at the equilibrium and therefore corresponds to a subsidy rather than a green tax. Finally, possible future developments of the proposed model are discussed.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A game-theoretical pricing model for green/non-green products

  • Francesco Biancalani,
  • Giorgio Gnecco,
  • Leonardo Badia

摘要

Environmental pollution represents a significant negative externality for society by imposing substantial costs on it. By incentivizing eco-friendly production, one can mitigate these costs and promote sustainable development. Given this framework, the present article formulates and solves a multi-stage game-theoretical pricing model involving two firms: one commercializes a non-green product; the other one is involved in the production of a green product. The model also involves the State, which can influence the two firms through a dual mechanism based on imposing an excise duty and promoting an advertising campaign. Firms’ profits and social welfare at the subgame perfect equilibrium are obtained in closed form, and their dependence on exogenous parameters is analyzed both theoretically and numerically. An interesting outcome of our analysis is that, in certain cases, the excise duty is found to be negative at the equilibrium and therefore corresponds to a subsidy rather than a green tax. Finally, possible future developments of the proposed model are discussed.