<p>Let <i>A</i> be the path algebra of a quiver of Dynkin type <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {A}_n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">A</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The module category <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(mod \,A\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mi>A</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> has a combinatorial model as the category of diagonals in a polygon <i>S</i> with <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n+1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> vertices. The recently introduced notion of almost rigid modules is a weakening of the classical notion of rigid modules. The importance of this new notion stems from the fact that maximal almost rigid <i>A</i>-modules are in bijection with the triangulations of the polygon <i>S</i>. In this article, we give a different realization of maximal almost rigid modules. We introduce a non-standard exact structure <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {E}_{\diamond }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">E</mi> <mo>⋄</mo> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> on <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(mod \,A\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mi>A</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> such that the maximal almost rigid <i>A</i>-modules in the usual exact structure are exactly the maximal rigid <i>A</i>-modules in the new exact structure. A maximal rigid module in this setting is the same as a tilting module. Thus the tilting theory relative to the exact structure <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {E}_{\diamond }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">E</mi> <mo>⋄</mo> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> translates into a theory of maximal almost rigid modules in the usual exact structure. As an application, we show that with the exact structure <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {E}_{\diamond }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">E</mi> <mo>⋄</mo> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, the module category becomes a 0-Auslander category in the sense of Gorsky, Nakaoka and Palu. We also discuss generalizations to quivers of type <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {D}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">D</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and gentle algebras.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

An Exact Structure Approach to Almost Rigid Modules Over Quivers of Type \(\mathbb {A}\)

  • Thomas Brüstle,
  • Eric J. Hanson,
  • Sunny Roy,
  • Ralf Schiffler

摘要

Let A be the path algebra of a quiver of Dynkin type \(\mathbb {A}_n\) A n . The module category \(mod \,A\) m o d A has a combinatorial model as the category of diagonals in a polygon S with \(n+1\) n + 1 vertices. The recently introduced notion of almost rigid modules is a weakening of the classical notion of rigid modules. The importance of this new notion stems from the fact that maximal almost rigid A-modules are in bijection with the triangulations of the polygon S. In this article, we give a different realization of maximal almost rigid modules. We introduce a non-standard exact structure \(\mathcal {E}_{\diamond }\) E on \(mod \,A\) m o d A such that the maximal almost rigid A-modules in the usual exact structure are exactly the maximal rigid A-modules in the new exact structure. A maximal rigid module in this setting is the same as a tilting module. Thus the tilting theory relative to the exact structure \(\mathcal {E}_{\diamond }\) E translates into a theory of maximal almost rigid modules in the usual exact structure. As an application, we show that with the exact structure \(\mathcal {E}_{\diamond }\) E , the module category becomes a 0-Auslander category in the sense of Gorsky, Nakaoka and Palu. We also discuss generalizations to quivers of type \(\mathbb {D}\) D and gentle algebras.