<p>In this paper, we explore the idea of comparing two multiple linear regression (MLR) models using the multistage sequential sampling approach. In particular, we intend to compare the linear parametric functions of two MLR models with standardized predictors while fixing the upper bounds on type I and type II error probabilities. We establish that such a comparison is not possible with any fixed-sample statistical technique. Therefore, we propose an optimal three-stage sequential sampling strategy to solve this problem. We study various attractive properties of the associated stopping rule, namely <i>first-order efficiency</i>, <i>second-order efficiency</i>, and <i>asymptotic consistency</i>. We also provide brief analyses on composite hypotheses, power comparisons, and sensitivity of the proposed methodology. The practical implications and limitations of the model assumptions are also discussed. An extensive simulation analysis is performed to validate the theoretical findings, and an application based on <i>Boston housing data</i> is provided for illustration purposes.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A three-stage sequential sampling procedure for comparing linear parametric functions of two multiple linear regression models with standardized predictors: illustration using Boston housing data

  • Ashwani Rajput,
  • Neeraj Joshi

摘要

In this paper, we explore the idea of comparing two multiple linear regression (MLR) models using the multistage sequential sampling approach. In particular, we intend to compare the linear parametric functions of two MLR models with standardized predictors while fixing the upper bounds on type I and type II error probabilities. We establish that such a comparison is not possible with any fixed-sample statistical technique. Therefore, we propose an optimal three-stage sequential sampling strategy to solve this problem. We study various attractive properties of the associated stopping rule, namely first-order efficiency, second-order efficiency, and asymptotic consistency. We also provide brief analyses on composite hypotheses, power comparisons, and sensitivity of the proposed methodology. The practical implications and limitations of the model assumptions are also discussed. An extensive simulation analysis is performed to validate the theoretical findings, and an application based on Boston housing data is provided for illustration purposes.