<p>Dielectrophoresis (DEP) manipulation combined with micro-electric impedance spectroscopy (µEIS) presents a sophisticated approach for cellular analysis and dielectric characterization. While conventional cell analysis techniques rely on complex labeling methods with inherent limitations, integrating DEP and µEIS offers non-invasive, label-free cellular characterization with enhanced sensitivity. This study presents an innovative dual-mode DEP platform incorporating both levitation (LEV<sub>DEP</sub>) and rotational (ROT<sub>DEP</sub>) forces, integrated with high-precision impedance measurement capabilities on one chip, enabling simultaneous Cell controlling and manipulation and dielectric signature extraction within a single microfluidic device. The fabricated and developed microfluidic platform demonstrated exceptional particle discrimination through the dual mode, with distinct responses for both particle populations. Under <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10404_2024_2785_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="23" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="65" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(F_{lEV.DEP}^{10.4 \mu m}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi>F</mi> <mrow> <mi>l</mi> <mi>E</mi> <mi>V</mi> <mo>.</mo> <mi>D</mi> <mi>E</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>10.4</mn> <mi>μ</mi> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> 2.01&#xa0;MHz showed a 63.4% magnitude increase, while <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10404_2024_2785_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="23" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="65" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(F_{lEV.DEP}^{24.9 \mu m }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi>F</mi> <mrow> <mi>l</mi> <mi>E</mi> <mi>V</mi> <mo>.</mo> <mi>D</mi> <mi>E</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>24.9</mn> <mi>μ</mi> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> , particles exhibited a higher 81.2% increase at the same force, yielding a 2.48 × enhancement in discrimination ratio compared to no-DEP conditions. ROT<sub>DEP</sub> at 110&#xa0;kHz induced even more pronounced differences, with <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10404_2024_2785_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="23" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="71" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(F_{ROT.DEP}^{10.4 \mu m}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi>F</mi> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mi>O</mi> <mi>T</mi> <mo>.</mo> <mi>D</mi> <mi>E</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>10.4</mn> <mi>μ</mi> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> showing a 120% magnitude increase (phase patterns: −24.501° to −34.363°) and <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10404_2024_2785_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="23" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="71" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(F_{ROT.DEP}^{24.9 \mu m}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi>F</mi> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mi>O</mi> <mi>T</mi> <mo>.</mo> <mi>D</mi> <mi>E</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>24.9</mn> <mi>μ</mi> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> µm particles demonstrating a 145% increase (phase patterns: −31.267° to −42.891°), achieving a 3.16 × discrimination ratio enhancement. The impedance spectrum revealed distinct frequency-dependent signatures, with ROT<sub>DEP</sub> showing superior mid-frequency discrimination (10.4&#xa0;µm: 1.9370×<InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10404_2024_2785_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="23" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({10}^{4}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> <mn>4</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> Ω vs 24.9&#xa0;µm: 2.0542×<InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10404_2024_2785_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="23" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({10}^{4}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> <mn>4</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> Ω at 110&#xa0;kHz) and LEV<sub>DEP</sub> optimizing high-frequency characterization (10.4&#xa0;µm: 1.6677×<InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10404_2024_2785_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="23" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({10}^{4}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> <mn>4</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> Ω vs 24.9&#xa0;µm: 1.5849×<InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10404_2024_2785_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="23" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({10}^{4}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> <mn>4</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> Ω at 2.01&#xa0;MHz). These signatures demonstrate the platform’s comprehensive particle characterization capabilities through complementary DEP forces. The dual-mode approach enhanced discrimination ratios by 2.48 × under <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10404_2024_2785_Article_IEq9.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="78" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(Lev. force\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>v</mi> <mo>.</mo> <mi>f</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>e</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and 3.16 × under <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10404_2024_2785_Article_IEq10.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="85" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(LEV. force\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> <mi>E</mi> <mi>V</mi> <mo>.</mo> <mi>f</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>e</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> at selected characteristic frequency range compared to <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10404_2024_2785_Article_IEq11.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="120" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(NonDEP force\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">NonDEPforce</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> conditions. Comprehensive impedance analysis through frequency spectrum (10&#xa0;kHz—2.01&#xa0;MHz) revealed unique frequency-dependent cell signatures, <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10404_2024_2785_Article_IEq12.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="87" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(ROT. force\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mi>O</mi> <mi>T</mi> <mo>.</mo> <mi>f</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>e</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> demonstrating superior mid-frequency discrimination (magnitude differences of 1.9370 × 10<sup>4</sup> Ω vs 2.0542 × 10<sup>4</sup> Ω at 110&#xa0;kHz) and LEV<sub>DEP</sub> optimizing high-frequency characterization (1.6677 × 10<sup>4</sup> Ω vs 1.5849 × 10<sup>4</sup> Ω at 2.01&#xa0;MHz). Impedance dielectric analysis conducted over the 10&#xa0;kHz to 2.01&#xa0;MHz frequency range demonstrated frequency-dependent characteristics for each selected cell population. ROT<sub>DEP</sub> enhanced the discrimination in the mid-frequency range (110&#xa0;kHz), with 10.4&#xa0;µm particles presenting impedance magnitudes of 1.9370 × 10<sup>4</sup> Ω, while 24.9&#xa0;µm particles displayed 2.0542 × 10<sup>4</sup> Ω, yielding a distinct separation ratio of 1.06 × . In the high-frequency domain (2.01&#xa0;MHz), LEV<sub>DEP</sub> optimized particle characterization revealed that 10.4&#xa0;µm particles exhibited a resistance of 1.6677 × 10<sup>4</sup> Ω. In contrast, 24.9&#xa0;µm particles showed a resistance of 1.5849 × 10<sup>4</sup> Ω, resulting in a separation ratio of 1.05 × . The dual-mode approach markedly improved discrimination capabilities, with LEV<sub>DEP</sub> demonstrating a 2.48 × enhancement and ROT<sub>DEP</sub> exhibiting a 3.16 × increase in separation ratios relative to no-DEP conditions. This proposed dual-force implementation exhibited notable efficacy in designated frequency ranges: ROT<sub>DEP</sub> excelled in mid-frequency discrimination, achieving magnitude differences of 11.72 × 10<sup>3</sup> Ω between particle populations, whereas LEV<sub>DEP</sub> optimized high-frequency characterization with differences of 8.28 × 10<sup>3</sup> Ω, facilitating comprehensive particle discrimination through complementary DEP forces. This study establishes a novel microfluidic platform integrating dual-mode DEP manipulation with high-sensitivity dielectric features impedance detection, achieving a 163.1% enhancement in signal-to-noise SNR ratio compared to the conventional impedance mode. The proposed system demonstrates exceptional particle discrimination capabilities, with LEV<sub>DEP</sub> achieving a 63.4% and 81.2% magnitude increase for 10.4&#xa0;µm and 24.9&#xa0;µm particles, respectively, at 2.01&#xa0;MHz. In comparison, ROT<sub>DEP</sub> induced more pronounced increases of 120% and 145% at 110&#xa0;kHz. The proposed system significantly improved discrimination ratios (2.48 × under LEV<sub>DEP</sub> and 3.16 × under ROT<sub>DEP</sub>) relative to no-DEP conditions, identifying clear phase behavior patterns for both particle populations. Impedance analysis over the 10&#xa0;kHz to 2.01&#xa0;MHz frequency range identified distinct frequency-dependent characteristics. ROT<sub>DEP</sub> exhibited enhanced mid-frequency discrimination, measuring 1.9370 × 10<sup>4</sup> Ω compared to 2.0542 × 10<sup>4</sup> Ω, while LEV<sub>DEP</sub> provided optimized high-frequency characterization, with values of 1.6677 × 10<sup>4</sup> Ω versus 1.5849 × 10<sup>4</sup> Ω. This system, which is label-free and non-invasive, facilitates cellular dielectric analysis with improved throughput and measurement precision. It provides substantial benefits for biological research, medical diagnostics, and drug analysis and development through its dual-force implementation and extensive impedance characterization capabilities.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Comprehensive characterization of a microfluidic platform for DEP manipulation and bio-impedance detection using multi-sized polystyrene microbeads

  • Sameh Sherif,
  • Yehya H. Ghallab,
  • Yehea Ismail

摘要

Dielectrophoresis (DEP) manipulation combined with micro-electric impedance spectroscopy (µEIS) presents a sophisticated approach for cellular analysis and dielectric characterization. While conventional cell analysis techniques rely on complex labeling methods with inherent limitations, integrating DEP and µEIS offers non-invasive, label-free cellular characterization with enhanced sensitivity. This study presents an innovative dual-mode DEP platform incorporating both levitation (LEVDEP) and rotational (ROTDEP) forces, integrated with high-precision impedance measurement capabilities on one chip, enabling simultaneous Cell controlling and manipulation and dielectric signature extraction within a single microfluidic device. The fabricated and developed microfluidic platform demonstrated exceptional particle discrimination through the dual mode, with distinct responses for both particle populations. Under \(F_{lEV.DEP}^{10.4 \mu m}\) F l E V . D E P 10.4 μ m 2.01 MHz showed a 63.4% magnitude increase, while \(F_{lEV.DEP}^{24.9 \mu m }\) F l E V . D E P 24.9 μ m , particles exhibited a higher 81.2% increase at the same force, yielding a 2.48 × enhancement in discrimination ratio compared to no-DEP conditions. ROTDEP at 110 kHz induced even more pronounced differences, with \(F_{ROT.DEP}^{10.4 \mu m}\) F R O T . D E P 10.4 μ m showing a 120% magnitude increase (phase patterns: −24.501° to −34.363°) and \(F_{ROT.DEP}^{24.9 \mu m}\) F R O T . D E P 24.9 μ m µm particles demonstrating a 145% increase (phase patterns: −31.267° to −42.891°), achieving a 3.16 × discrimination ratio enhancement. The impedance spectrum revealed distinct frequency-dependent signatures, with ROTDEP showing superior mid-frequency discrimination (10.4 µm: 1.9370× \({10}^{4}\) 10 4 Ω vs 24.9 µm: 2.0542× \({10}^{4}\) 10 4 Ω at 110 kHz) and LEVDEP optimizing high-frequency characterization (10.4 µm: 1.6677× \({10}^{4}\) 10 4 Ω vs 24.9 µm: 1.5849× \({10}^{4}\) 10 4 Ω at 2.01 MHz). These signatures demonstrate the platform’s comprehensive particle characterization capabilities through complementary DEP forces. The dual-mode approach enhanced discrimination ratios by 2.48 × under \(Lev. force\) L e v . f o r c e and 3.16 × under \(LEV. force\) L E V . f o r c e at selected characteristic frequency range compared to \(NonDEP force\) NonDEPforce conditions. Comprehensive impedance analysis through frequency spectrum (10 kHz—2.01 MHz) revealed unique frequency-dependent cell signatures, \(ROT. force\) R O T . f o r c e demonstrating superior mid-frequency discrimination (magnitude differences of 1.9370 × 104 Ω vs 2.0542 × 104 Ω at 110 kHz) and LEVDEP optimizing high-frequency characterization (1.6677 × 104 Ω vs 1.5849 × 104 Ω at 2.01 MHz). Impedance dielectric analysis conducted over the 10 kHz to 2.01 MHz frequency range demonstrated frequency-dependent characteristics for each selected cell population. ROTDEP enhanced the discrimination in the mid-frequency range (110 kHz), with 10.4 µm particles presenting impedance magnitudes of 1.9370 × 104 Ω, while 24.9 µm particles displayed 2.0542 × 104 Ω, yielding a distinct separation ratio of 1.06 × . In the high-frequency domain (2.01 MHz), LEVDEP optimized particle characterization revealed that 10.4 µm particles exhibited a resistance of 1.6677 × 104 Ω. In contrast, 24.9 µm particles showed a resistance of 1.5849 × 104 Ω, resulting in a separation ratio of 1.05 × . The dual-mode approach markedly improved discrimination capabilities, with LEVDEP demonstrating a 2.48 × enhancement and ROTDEP exhibiting a 3.16 × increase in separation ratios relative to no-DEP conditions. This proposed dual-force implementation exhibited notable efficacy in designated frequency ranges: ROTDEP excelled in mid-frequency discrimination, achieving magnitude differences of 11.72 × 103 Ω between particle populations, whereas LEVDEP optimized high-frequency characterization with differences of 8.28 × 103 Ω, facilitating comprehensive particle discrimination through complementary DEP forces. This study establishes a novel microfluidic platform integrating dual-mode DEP manipulation with high-sensitivity dielectric features impedance detection, achieving a 163.1% enhancement in signal-to-noise SNR ratio compared to the conventional impedance mode. The proposed system demonstrates exceptional particle discrimination capabilities, with LEVDEP achieving a 63.4% and 81.2% magnitude increase for 10.4 µm and 24.9 µm particles, respectively, at 2.01 MHz. In comparison, ROTDEP induced more pronounced increases of 120% and 145% at 110 kHz. The proposed system significantly improved discrimination ratios (2.48 × under LEVDEP and 3.16 × under ROTDEP) relative to no-DEP conditions, identifying clear phase behavior patterns for both particle populations. Impedance analysis over the 10 kHz to 2.01 MHz frequency range identified distinct frequency-dependent characteristics. ROTDEP exhibited enhanced mid-frequency discrimination, measuring 1.9370 × 104 Ω compared to 2.0542 × 104 Ω, while LEVDEP provided optimized high-frequency characterization, with values of 1.6677 × 104 Ω versus 1.5849 × 104 Ω. This system, which is label-free and non-invasive, facilitates cellular dielectric analysis with improved throughput and measurement precision. It provides substantial benefits for biological research, medical diagnostics, and drug analysis and development through its dual-force implementation and extensive impedance characterization capabilities.