<p>Mounting evidence across multiple disciplines supports the health benefits of connection to nature. Although this trend suggests that the human-nature relationship is integral to health, its importance is often overlooked in clinical practice due, in part, to lack of consensus on its scope, limits, and terminology. To fill a needed gap, we developed a consensus statement on an inter-connectivity based view of health termed Ecological Medicine. The study recruited an expert working group and used modified Delphi technique and focus groups. The Ecological Medicine Working Group was directed toward Ecological Medicine consensus goals that included: (1) a consensus definition and framework, (2) priorities for practice, research, education, and policy, and (3) Ecological Medicine’s implications. A consensus definition and framework for Ecological Medicine was reached, focusing on the importance of human inter-connections (to self, others, non-human species, and natural environment) in informing health understanding. Ecological Medicine suggests that healthcare should shift toward inter-connectivity, relationality, and health practices involving connection-based interventions, especially nature-based interventions. This framework may benefit research, practice, education, policy and other domains of healthcare by focusing on the importance and benefits of connectivity-based health interventions and on the inseparability of human health and planetary health.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A Consensus Statement for Ecological Medicine: Moving Toward Connection-Based Medicine

  • Michael Makhinson,
  • Landon Pollack,
  • Ronan Hallowell,
  • Conor H. Murray,
  • Jay E. Maddock,
  • Stephanie Michael Stewart,
  • Avik Basu,
  • David King,
  • Helena Hansen,
  • Allison C. Alberts,
  • Brian Anderson,
  • Kate Armstrong,
  • James C. Bassett,
  • Francis J. Baumont de Oliveira,
  • Jamie Beachy,
  • Manijeh Berenji,
  • Anya K. Bershad,
  • Joanna E. Bettman,
  • Daniel T. Blumstein,
  • Lindsay Branham,
  • Matthew H. E. M. Browning,
  • Taimie L. Bryant,
  • Rebecca M. Calisi Rodriguez,
  • Yosuke Chikamoto,
  • Benjamin Collins,
  • Ziva D. Cooper,
  • Dana Cuff,
  • Cynthia Davis,
  • Katrina F. DeBonis,
  • Somayeh Dodge,
  • Lynette A. Hart,
  • Marco Iacoboni,
  • Celina M. De Leon,
  • Aubrey H. Fine,
  • Lisa R. Fortuna,
  • Sam Gandy,
  • Nancy Gee,
  • Diana S. Grigsby-Toussaint,
  • Charles S. Grob,
  • Suma Jacob,
  • Jessica K. Jeffrey,
  • Laura H. Kahn,
  • Nurit D. Katz,
  • Michael Kaufmann,
  • Heather Kuiper,
  • Beatriz C. Labate,
  • Sheila Laffey,
  • Tieraona Low Dog,
  • Todd Lynch,
  • Olivia McAnirlin,
  • Joseph McCowan,
  • Daphne Miller,
  • Barbara Natterson-Horowitz,
  • Alessandro Ossola,
  • Teresa L. Penbrooke,
  • Patricia Pendry,
  • Michelle V. Porche,
  • Jessica D. Pratt,
  • Elena Rios,
  • Sylvie Rokab,
  • Jose Sanchez,
  • Jack Saul,
  • Felix E. Schweizer,
  • Sue Sisley,
  • Martyna Skalna,
  • Wendelin Slusser,
  • Olga Solomon,
  • Melissa Sundermann,
  • Sujit Thomas,
  • Karen Waconda Lewis,
  • Rosalind Watts,
  • Jennifer Wolch,
  • Lee Zasloff

摘要

Mounting evidence across multiple disciplines supports the health benefits of connection to nature. Although this trend suggests that the human-nature relationship is integral to health, its importance is often overlooked in clinical practice due, in part, to lack of consensus on its scope, limits, and terminology. To fill a needed gap, we developed a consensus statement on an inter-connectivity based view of health termed Ecological Medicine. The study recruited an expert working group and used modified Delphi technique and focus groups. The Ecological Medicine Working Group was directed toward Ecological Medicine consensus goals that included: (1) a consensus definition and framework, (2) priorities for practice, research, education, and policy, and (3) Ecological Medicine’s implications. A consensus definition and framework for Ecological Medicine was reached, focusing on the importance of human inter-connections (to self, others, non-human species, and natural environment) in informing health understanding. Ecological Medicine suggests that healthcare should shift toward inter-connectivity, relationality, and health practices involving connection-based interventions, especially nature-based interventions. This framework may benefit research, practice, education, policy and other domains of healthcare by focusing on the importance and benefits of connectivity-based health interventions and on the inseparability of human health and planetary health.