Scholarlink

Aim <p>This study analysed gender and socioeconomic (SE) inequalities in adolescent mental well-being in Barcelona, Spain, using data from two cross-sectional waves (2016 and 2021), examining the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and considering pre-existing disparities. The research aimed to understand how these factors influenced mental well-being at two time points, with a particular focus on intersecting vulnerabilities.</p> Subject and methods <p>A repeated cross-sectional analysis was performed using data from the FRESC survey (students aged 13–16 years: 2016, <i>N</i> = 2274; 2021, <i>N</i> = 2179). Mental well-being was measured using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS). Multivariate linear regressions accounted for individual- and school-level SE characteristics, including clustering at the school level, and effect sizes (Cohen’s d) were used to assess changes over time. Analyses included stratification by sex and exploration of collinearity among SE indicators.</p> Results <p>Mental well-being scores were significantly lower in 2021 compared to 2016, with sharper reductions observed in girls (effect size = –0.43, 95% CI –0.52 to –0.35) than in boys (–0.28, 95% CI –0.36 to –0.19). Students from low SE backgrounds and state schools experienced the steepest declines, particularly girls (adjusted β = –4.71, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). By contrast, immigrant students showed smaller differences between years, although they reported lower levels of well-being in both waves.</p> Conclusion <p>The study revealed persistent gender and SE inequalities in adolescent mental well-being, with notable declines in 2021 coinciding with the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings emphasise the need for intersectional, gender- and equity-sensitive strategies, particularly those addressing youth facing multiple and intersecting social disadvantages.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Gender and socioeconomic inequalities in adolescent mental well-being in Barcelona: a repeated cross-sectional study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月1日

查看全文
  • Marc Olivella-Cirici,
  • Gemma Vilagut,
  • Esther Sánchez-Ledesma,
  • Gemma Serral,
  • Mònica Cortés-Albaladejo,
  • Pol Montemayor Cejas,
  • Maribel Pasarín,
  • Jordi Alonso,
  • Glòria Pérez

摘要

Aim

This study analysed gender and socioeconomic (SE) inequalities in adolescent mental well-being in Barcelona, Spain, using data from two cross-sectional waves (2016 and 2021), examining the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and considering pre-existing disparities. The research aimed to understand how these factors influenced mental well-being at two time points, with a particular focus on intersecting vulnerabilities.

Subject and methods

A repeated cross-sectional analysis was performed using data from the FRESC survey (students aged 13–16 years: 2016, N = 2274; 2021, N = 2179). Mental well-being was measured using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS). Multivariate linear regressions accounted for individual- and school-level SE characteristics, including clustering at the school level, and effect sizes (Cohen’s d) were used to assess changes over time. Analyses included stratification by sex and exploration of collinearity among SE indicators.

Results

Mental well-being scores were significantly lower in 2021 compared to 2016, with sharper reductions observed in girls (effect size = –0.43, 95% CI –0.52 to –0.35) than in boys (–0.28, 95% CI –0.36 to –0.19). Students from low SE backgrounds and state schools experienced the steepest declines, particularly girls (adjusted β = –4.71, p < 0.001). By contrast, immigrant students showed smaller differences between years, although they reported lower levels of well-being in both waves.

Conclusion

The study revealed persistent gender and SE inequalities in adolescent mental well-being, with notable declines in 2021 coinciding with the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings emphasise the need for intersectional, gender- and equity-sensitive strategies, particularly those addressing youth facing multiple and intersecting social disadvantages.