Scholarlink

Purpose <p>To investigate the influence of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) administration on breast lesions’ signal intensities on diffusion-weighted images and its derived ADC maps acquired 2 min after GBCA administration.</p> Materials and methods <p>An intra-patient analysis was performed. 110 lesions &gt; 5&#xa0;mm in 93 patients, visible on screening and pre-operative MRI scans at 1.5&#xa0;T and 3.0&#xa0;T, were included. Pre-contrast and post-contrast DWI were acquired with single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SSh-SE-EPI) with b0, b50, b150, and b800 diffusion weightings. 2D regions of interest were drawn. Each <i>b</i> value was separately analyzed regarding signal intensities on DWI. Furthermore, ADC values were compared based on the pairs b0–b800 and b150–b800. The comparison between pre- and post-contrast DWIs was investigated within and between different groups (overall, malignant/benign, and at 1.5/3.0&#xa0;T). The Wilcoxon-signed rank test and independent Student <i>T</i> test were used when appropriate. <i>P</i> &lt; 0.01 was considered as statistically significant.</p> Results <p>Overall, and for malignant and benign lesions separately, a significant change after contrast administration in signal intensity was observed at each specific <i>b</i> value, irrespective of the use of 1.5&#xa0;T or 3.0&#xa0;T. The effect of contrast administration was overall notably different when comparing b0 (+ 9.4%) vs. b800 (+ 11.8%), but this was not observed between b150 (11.4%) and b800 (11.8%) (<i>P</i> = 0.10). In malignant lesions, specifically, all <i>b</i> value pairs, except b0–b50, showed significant differences in GBCA effects. This translates into a pre–post-contrast difference of the ADC value of 3.2% (<i>P</i> = 0.02) when based on b0–b800 and 0.9% (<i>P</i> = 0.11) when using b150–800.</p> Conclusions <p>There is a limited, but significant effect of contrast administration on DW signal intensities measured 2 min after contrast administration. This effect is not the same for each <i>b</i> value. Signal change is stronger for high than for low <i>b</i> values, which leads to a larger change in measured ADC values after contrast administration when b0 and b50 are incorporated in the calculation. As a consequence, ADC calculations obtained from b150–b800 seem to be more robust than those obtained from b0–b800.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Influence of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) on the diffusion weightings of breast lesions: an intra-patient analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月29日

查看全文
  • Kay J. J. van der Hoogt,
  • Robert-Jan Schipper,
  • Leon C. ter Beek,
  • Ronni Wessels,
  • Hedda J. van der Hulst,
  • Arjan te Boekhorst,
  • Regina G. H. Beets-Tan,
  • Ritse M. Mann

摘要

Purpose

To investigate the influence of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) administration on breast lesions’ signal intensities on diffusion-weighted images and its derived ADC maps acquired 2 min after GBCA administration.

Materials and methods

An intra-patient analysis was performed. 110 lesions > 5 mm in 93 patients, visible on screening and pre-operative MRI scans at 1.5 T and 3.0 T, were included. Pre-contrast and post-contrast DWI were acquired with single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SSh-SE-EPI) with b0, b50, b150, and b800 diffusion weightings. 2D regions of interest were drawn. Each b value was separately analyzed regarding signal intensities on DWI. Furthermore, ADC values were compared based on the pairs b0–b800 and b150–b800. The comparison between pre- and post-contrast DWIs was investigated within and between different groups (overall, malignant/benign, and at 1.5/3.0 T). The Wilcoxon-signed rank test and independent Student T test were used when appropriate. P < 0.01 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

Overall, and for malignant and benign lesions separately, a significant change after contrast administration in signal intensity was observed at each specific b value, irrespective of the use of 1.5 T or 3.0 T. The effect of contrast administration was overall notably different when comparing b0 (+ 9.4%) vs. b800 (+ 11.8%), but this was not observed between b150 (11.4%) and b800 (11.8%) (P = 0.10). In malignant lesions, specifically, all b value pairs, except b0–b50, showed significant differences in GBCA effects. This translates into a pre–post-contrast difference of the ADC value of 3.2% (P = 0.02) when based on b0–b800 and 0.9% (P = 0.11) when using b150–800.

Conclusions

There is a limited, but significant effect of contrast administration on DW signal intensities measured 2 min after contrast administration. This effect is not the same for each b value. Signal change is stronger for high than for low b values, which leads to a larger change in measured ADC values after contrast administration when b0 and b50 are incorporated in the calculation. As a consequence, ADC calculations obtained from b150–b800 seem to be more robust than those obtained from b0–b800.