<p>Conventional brain tumour progression tracking methods inherently assume consistent image acquisition conditions between baseline and follow-up scans. In practice, however, MRI data often suffer from harmonisation issues due to variations in acquisition protocols, scanner settings, or patient positioning. To address this, we propose an image-based approach capable of identifying and localising changes between baseline and follow-up MRI scans without requiring independent registration or extensive pre-processing. Our registration-invariant method leverages the internal feature maps of a Siamese network composed of two segmentation models based on dilated convolutions, allowing it to learn long-context spatial features. These features are used to detect and localise changes directly from the input images, which are then enhanced using panchromatic sharpening to emphasise both high-level structural and pixel-level differences within the resulting change map. When tested on previously unseen, unregistered MRI scans, the method outperformed baseline models in identifying and localising resected tumour tissue (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10278_2025_1744_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="79" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{F}_{\varvec{1}} \varvec{= 0.64}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn mathvariant="bold">1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo mathvariant="bold">=</mo> <mn mathvariant="bold">0.64</mn> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10278_2025_1744_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="98" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{IoU = 0.57}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">I</mi> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">o</mi> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">U</mi> <mo mathvariant="bold">=</mo> <mn mathvariant="bold">0.57</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> versus baseline <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10278_2025_1744_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="79" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{F}_{\varvec{1}} \varvec{= 0.11}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn mathvariant="bold">1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo mathvariant="bold">=</mo> <mn mathvariant="bold">0.11</mn> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10278_2025_1744_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="98" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{IoU = 0.07}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">I</mi> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">o</mi> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">U</mi> <mo mathvariant="bold">=</mo> <mn mathvariant="bold">0.07</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>). This performance remained robust under conditions of augmentation, noise, and misalignment (<InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10278_2025_1744_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="79" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{F}_{\varvec{1}} \varvec{= 0.55}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn mathvariant="bold">1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo mathvariant="bold">=</mo> <mn mathvariant="bold">0.55</mn> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10278_2025_1744_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="98" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{IoU = 0.45}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">I</mi> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">o</mi> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">U</mi> <mo mathvariant="bold">=</mo> <mn mathvariant="bold">0.45</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), highlighting its resilience to real-world imaging variability. Overall, the proposed approach demonstrates strong robustness to spatial misalignment and offers a promising solution for tracking tumour progression and regression in clinical environments where reliable registration cannot be guaranteed.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Image-Based Identification and Localisation of Changes in Intraoperative Brain Tumour Resection

  • Adil Jahouh,
  • Andrei Jalba,
  • Maxime Chamberland

摘要

Conventional brain tumour progression tracking methods inherently assume consistent image acquisition conditions between baseline and follow-up scans. In practice, however, MRI data often suffer from harmonisation issues due to variations in acquisition protocols, scanner settings, or patient positioning. To address this, we propose an image-based approach capable of identifying and localising changes between baseline and follow-up MRI scans without requiring independent registration or extensive pre-processing. Our registration-invariant method leverages the internal feature maps of a Siamese network composed of two segmentation models based on dilated convolutions, allowing it to learn long-context spatial features. These features are used to detect and localise changes directly from the input images, which are then enhanced using panchromatic sharpening to emphasise both high-level structural and pixel-level differences within the resulting change map. When tested on previously unseen, unregistered MRI scans, the method outperformed baseline models in identifying and localising resected tumour tissue ( \(\varvec{F}_{\varvec{1}} \varvec{= 0.64}\) F 1 = 0.64 and \(\varvec{IoU = 0.57}\) I o U = 0.57 versus baseline \(\varvec{F}_{\varvec{1}} \varvec{= 0.11}\) F 1 = 0.11 and \(\varvec{IoU = 0.07}\) I o U = 0.07 ). This performance remained robust under conditions of augmentation, noise, and misalignment ( \(\varvec{F}_{\varvec{1}} \varvec{= 0.55}\) F 1 = 0.55 and \(\varvec{IoU = 0.45}\) I o U = 0.45 ), highlighting its resilience to real-world imaging variability. Overall, the proposed approach demonstrates strong robustness to spatial misalignment and offers a promising solution for tracking tumour progression and regression in clinical environments where reliable registration cannot be guaranteed.