Purpose <p>To assess system properties of the human auditory system, such as cochlear gain, frequency selectivity, and their dependence on frequency and level, it is essential to examine the interrelation of various readouts. By measuring and analyzing otoacoustic emission (OAE) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) latencies, among others, predictions of cochlear models and applicability of properties such as the minimum-phase principle, level dependence of latencies, or related changes of the gain of a presumed positive-feedback mechanism can be investigated.</p> Methods <p>Here, we present measurements of the latency of the nonlinear-distortion component of pulsed distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{f_2}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mi> <mn mathvariant="bold">2</mn> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 1–14 kHz, <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{L_2}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">L</mi> <mn mathvariant="bold">2</mn> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 25–85 dB SPL) in 20 ears (12 female, 8 male). This yields a direct estimate of intracochlear traveling-wave build-up by recording the time elapsed between the <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{f_2}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mi> <mn mathvariant="bold">2</mn> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> primary stimulus and the distortion-product pulse response. Thus, this technique does not require deriving latency from phase gradients of the coherent-reflection component of different frequencies, as is done using swept-tone DPOAE or SFOAE.</p> Results <p>At low stimulus levels (<InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{L_2}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">L</mi> <mn mathvariant="bold">2</mn> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 35 dB), DPOAE latency was 13&#xa0;ms at <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{f_2}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mi> <mn mathvariant="bold">2</mn> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 1 kHz, exponentially to &#xa0;2&#xa0;ms at <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{f_2}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mi> <mn mathvariant="bold">2</mn> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 12–14 kHz. In periods of the corresponding frequency, this rose from <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\approx \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>≈</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>13 periods at 1 kHz to <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\ge \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>≥</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>25 periods above 6 kHz. Between 3 and 6 kHz, latency showed a steeper rise, departing from a pure exponential relation. Level dependence of latencies varied among subjects, with changes ranging from –2 to –12% per 10 dB level increase. Test-retest reliability of latency determination with pulsed DPOAE was excellent.</p> Conclusion <p>For frequencies above 1 kHz and up to 14 kHz, OAE latency data align with a scaling law of <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\approx \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>≈</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>0.3 dB/dB. A transition region between 3 and 6 kHz shows scaling in some ears approaching 1 dB/dB, violating local scaling symmetry. Although comparison with ABR literature reveals some unresolved discrepancies, latencies of pulsed DPOAE allow a way to estimate cochlear tuning properties.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Latencies of Pulsed Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions and Their Relation to Auditory Brainstem Responses

  • Ernst Dalhoff,
  • Dennis Zelle,
  • Katharina Bader

摘要

Purpose

To assess system properties of the human auditory system, such as cochlear gain, frequency selectivity, and their dependence on frequency and level, it is essential to examine the interrelation of various readouts. By measuring and analyzing otoacoustic emission (OAE) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) latencies, among others, predictions of cochlear models and applicability of properties such as the minimum-phase principle, level dependence of latencies, or related changes of the gain of a presumed positive-feedback mechanism can be investigated.

Methods

Here, we present measurements of the latency of the nonlinear-distortion component of pulsed distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) ( \(\varvec{f_2}\) f 2 = 1–14 kHz, \(\varvec{L_2}\) L 2 = 25–85 dB SPL) in 20 ears (12 female, 8 male). This yields a direct estimate of intracochlear traveling-wave build-up by recording the time elapsed between the \(\varvec{f_2}\) f 2 primary stimulus and the distortion-product pulse response. Thus, this technique does not require deriving latency from phase gradients of the coherent-reflection component of different frequencies, as is done using swept-tone DPOAE or SFOAE.

Results

At low stimulus levels ( \(\varvec{L_2}\) L 2 = 35 dB), DPOAE latency was 13 ms at \(\varvec{f_2}\) f 2 = 1 kHz, exponentially to  2 ms at \(\varvec{f_2}\) f 2 = 12–14 kHz. In periods of the corresponding frequency, this rose from \(\approx \) 13 periods at 1 kHz to \(\ge \) 25 periods above 6 kHz. Between 3 and 6 kHz, latency showed a steeper rise, departing from a pure exponential relation. Level dependence of latencies varied among subjects, with changes ranging from –2 to –12% per 10 dB level increase. Test-retest reliability of latency determination with pulsed DPOAE was excellent.

Conclusion

For frequencies above 1 kHz and up to 14 kHz, OAE latency data align with a scaling law of \(\approx \) 0.3 dB/dB. A transition region between 3 and 6 kHz shows scaling in some ears approaching 1 dB/dB, violating local scaling symmetry. Although comparison with ABR literature reveals some unresolved discrepancies, latencies of pulsed DPOAE allow a way to estimate cochlear tuning properties.