Clinical factors associated with long-term renal outcomes in Japanese patients with IgA nephropathy presenting with nephrotic range proteinuria: a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study
摘要
Patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) occasionally present with nephrotic range proteinuria (NRP), but the clinical features and long-term renal prognosis of patients with IgAN-related NRP (IgAN-NRP) with or without nephrotic syndrome (NS) remain elusive.
MethodsA retrospective, multicenter, cohort study enrolled 788 patients with IgAN from 42 medical centers in 2002–2004. Patients were divided into NRP (group I, n = 39) and non-NRP (group II, n = 749) groups. Group I patients were subdivided into NRP with NS (I-A, n = 14) and NRP without NS (I-B, n = 25) groups. The primary outcome (PO) was a 1.5-fold increase in serum creatinine from baseline. Clinical remission (CR) was defined as both hematuria and proteinuria remission on ≥3 consecutive tests over at least 6 months.
ResultsCompared with group II, group I had significantly more severe renal dysfunction and received steroid therapy more frequently. During a median follow-up of 90.0 months, more patients reached the PO in group I (38.5%) than in group II (11.0%). Multivariate analysis of all enrolled patients showed that NRP was a significant independent risk factor for the PO. However, in group I, 10 of 11 patients who achieved CR had a favorable renal prognosis, and corticosteroid therapy significantly attenuated the risk for the PO. When comparing groups I-A and I-B, baseline renal impairment and cumulative probabilities of the PO were comparable.
ConclusionRegardless of the presence of NS, IgAN-NRP is a critical factor leading to a poor prognosis, unless CR is achieved. Intensive treatment might be vital for IgAN-NRP.