Scholarlink

Purpose <p>Ultrasound (US) has evolved as the principal imaging modality in the evaluation of pediatric appendicitis due to inherent advantages but may vary in performance based on setting. Rapid focused Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rapid MRI) is a feasible alternative, but emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) may be impacted. We wished to determine the performance and LOS of US and rapid MRI in a pediatric ED within a general hospital in the evaluation of appendicitis.</p> Methods <p>We conducted a retrospective diagnostic accuracy study of patients &lt; 18 years of age with abdominal pain receiving imaging for evaluation of appendicitis (US or rapid MRI). We report descriptive statistics on demographics and clinical characteristics of the study population. We conducted a sensitivity analysis by the different imaging type and combinations performed.</p> Results <p>Sensitivity and specificity for US and rapid MRI were 65.3% (95% CI: 57.5%–72.5%); 97.0% (95% CI: 94.5%–98.5%) and 98.3% (95% CI: 90.6%–100.0%); 96.1%, (95% CI: 91.1%–98.7%), respectively. US alone was associated with the shortest median ED LOS (5.3 hours, IQR 3.9–7.8), followed by rapid MRI alone (7.9 hours, IQR 5.4–8.6). US with subsequent rapid MRI was associated with the longest ED LOS (10.6 hours, IQR 7.6–13.3).</p> Conclusion <p>US was nondiagnostic for a substantial number of studies performed resulting in suboptimal sensitivity for the diagnosis of appendicitis. Rapid MRI had better sensitivity but a greater LOS. Future work should focus on determining potential barriers that exist and incorporating strategies to enhance US performance and/or decrease rapid MRI LOS.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Diagnosis of acute appendicitis at a pediatric emergency department within a general hospital

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月24日

查看全文
  • Cade A. Johnson,
  • Catherine M. Pivalizza,
  • Hei Kit Chan,
  • Hannah Smith,
  • Megan K. Long,
  • Robert Lapus,
  • KuoJen Tsao,
  • Susan John,
  • Irma T. Ugalde

摘要

Purpose

Ultrasound (US) has evolved as the principal imaging modality in the evaluation of pediatric appendicitis due to inherent advantages but may vary in performance based on setting. Rapid focused Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rapid MRI) is a feasible alternative, but emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) may be impacted. We wished to determine the performance and LOS of US and rapid MRI in a pediatric ED within a general hospital in the evaluation of appendicitis.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective diagnostic accuracy study of patients < 18 years of age with abdominal pain receiving imaging for evaluation of appendicitis (US or rapid MRI). We report descriptive statistics on demographics and clinical characteristics of the study population. We conducted a sensitivity analysis by the different imaging type and combinations performed.

Results

Sensitivity and specificity for US and rapid MRI were 65.3% (95% CI: 57.5%–72.5%); 97.0% (95% CI: 94.5%–98.5%) and 98.3% (95% CI: 90.6%–100.0%); 96.1%, (95% CI: 91.1%–98.7%), respectively. US alone was associated with the shortest median ED LOS (5.3 hours, IQR 3.9–7.8), followed by rapid MRI alone (7.9 hours, IQR 5.4–8.6). US with subsequent rapid MRI was associated with the longest ED LOS (10.6 hours, IQR 7.6–13.3).

Conclusion

US was nondiagnostic for a substantial number of studies performed resulting in suboptimal sensitivity for the diagnosis of appendicitis. Rapid MRI had better sensitivity but a greater LOS. Future work should focus on determining potential barriers that exist and incorporating strategies to enhance US performance and/or decrease rapid MRI LOS.

Graphical Abstract