Scholarlink

Purpose <p>To quantify the diagnostic yield of neuroimaging in adult emergency department (ED) patients presenting with vertigo, and to identify clinical predictors of acute central pathology that can inform imaging decisions.</p> Methods <p>This retrospective study reviewed all neuroimaging examinations performed for vertigo at 14 EDs within our health network between May 2016 and January 2025. Adult ED patients (<i>n</i>=4,135; mean age 62.5 years; 62% female) who underwent imaging (<i>n</i>=5,445 exams, approximately 89% CT and 11% MR) were included. Imaging exams with potentially clinically relevant findings were flagged for further review (<i>n</i>=291 exams and patients); these patients were separated into four separate groups based on their imaging findings: 1) acute actionable contributory to vertigo, 2) acute actionable non-contributory to vertigo, 3) non-acute actionable, or 4) non-actionable. Vertigo quality (constant, intermittent/resolved spontaneously, no vertigo), acuity, neurological examination (including cerebellar signs and the Head-Impulse, Nystagmus, and Test-of-Skew [HINTS] exam), and intervention rates were analyzed within these subgroups using Fisher’s exact and chi-square tests.</p> Results <p>Of 5,445 exams, 291 (5.3%) were flagged with potentially relevant imaging findings. Of these exams, only 115 (2.1%) yielded actionable findings, and just 65 (1.2%) revealed acute central causes contributing to vertigo. In patients with positive imaging findings, constant vertigo was strongly associated with acute contributory pathology (98.5% in this group vs. 6.0% in other groups, <i>p</i>&lt;0.0001). Acute onset was more frequent in acute contributory cases (63.1% vs. 40.8%, <i>p</i>=0.0006), as were abnormal HINTS or cerebellar signs (44.6% vs. 6.0%, <i>p</i>&lt;0.0001). Most patients with acute contributory findings received specialty consultations resulting in intervention (95.4%). Intermittent or resolved vertigo was commonly seen in patients with benign peripheral diagnoses.</p> Conclusion <p>Neuroimaging frequently yields normal results in ED vertigo cases; acute actionable central findings deemed contributory to vertigo are rare. Only approximately 2% of patients had acute actionable imaging findings and only 1.3% had a stroke. In patients with acute actionable imaging findings, clinical features—especially constant vertigo, acute onset, and abnormal neurological exam—are strongly associated with central causes and should guide selective imaging in the ED.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Low incidence of acute actionable imaging findings in emergency department patients imaged for vertigo: Retrospective analysis and proposed guidelines

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月22日

查看全文
  • Raven Spencer,
  • Jason Gandhi,
  • Justin Tepe,
  • Charles Li,
  • Matthew Kulzer,
  • John O’Neill,
  • Laura Eisenmenger,
  • Michael Goldberg,
  • Aichi Chien,
  • Warren Chang

摘要

Purpose

To quantify the diagnostic yield of neuroimaging in adult emergency department (ED) patients presenting with vertigo, and to identify clinical predictors of acute central pathology that can inform imaging decisions.

Methods

This retrospective study reviewed all neuroimaging examinations performed for vertigo at 14 EDs within our health network between May 2016 and January 2025. Adult ED patients (n=4,135; mean age 62.5 years; 62% female) who underwent imaging (n=5,445 exams, approximately 89% CT and 11% MR) were included. Imaging exams with potentially clinically relevant findings were flagged for further review (n=291 exams and patients); these patients were separated into four separate groups based on their imaging findings: 1) acute actionable contributory to vertigo, 2) acute actionable non-contributory to vertigo, 3) non-acute actionable, or 4) non-actionable. Vertigo quality (constant, intermittent/resolved spontaneously, no vertigo), acuity, neurological examination (including cerebellar signs and the Head-Impulse, Nystagmus, and Test-of-Skew [HINTS] exam), and intervention rates were analyzed within these subgroups using Fisher’s exact and chi-square tests.

Results

Of 5,445 exams, 291 (5.3%) were flagged with potentially relevant imaging findings. Of these exams, only 115 (2.1%) yielded actionable findings, and just 65 (1.2%) revealed acute central causes contributing to vertigo. In patients with positive imaging findings, constant vertigo was strongly associated with acute contributory pathology (98.5% in this group vs. 6.0% in other groups, p<0.0001). Acute onset was more frequent in acute contributory cases (63.1% vs. 40.8%, p=0.0006), as were abnormal HINTS or cerebellar signs (44.6% vs. 6.0%, p<0.0001). Most patients with acute contributory findings received specialty consultations resulting in intervention (95.4%). Intermittent or resolved vertigo was commonly seen in patients with benign peripheral diagnoses.

Conclusion

Neuroimaging frequently yields normal results in ED vertigo cases; acute actionable central findings deemed contributory to vertigo are rare. Only approximately 2% of patients had acute actionable imaging findings and only 1.3% had a stroke. In patients with acute actionable imaging findings, clinical features—especially constant vertigo, acute onset, and abnormal neurological exam—are strongly associated with central causes and should guide selective imaging in the ED.

Graphical Abstract