<p>In this paper, we study contention resolution schemes for matchings. Given a fractional matching <i>x</i> and a random set <i>R</i>(<i>x</i>) where each edge <i>e</i> appears independently with probability <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10107_2024_2178_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="12" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(x_e\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mi>e</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, we want to select a matching <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10107_2024_2178_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="78" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(M \subseteq R(x)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>M</mi> <mo>⊆</mo> <mi>R</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> such that <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10107_2024_2178_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="184" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Pr [e \in M \mid e \in R(x)] \ge c\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>Pr</mo> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mi>e</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mi>M</mi> <mo>∣</mo> <mi>e</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mi>R</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> <mo>≥</mo> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, for <i>c</i> as large as possible. We call such a selection method a <i>c</i>-balanced contention resolution scheme. Our main results are (i) an asymptotically optimal <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10107_2024_2178_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="56" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\simeq 0.544\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>≃</mo> <mn>0.544</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-balanced contention resolution scheme for general matchings when <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10107_2024_2178_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="77" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Vert x\Vert _\infty \rightarrow 0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">‖</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">‖</mo> </mrow> <mi>∞</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and (ii) a 0.509-balanced contention resolution scheme for bipartite matchings (without any restriction on <i>x</i>). To the best of our knowledge, this result establishes for the first time, in any natural relaxation of a combinatorial optimization problem, a separation between (i) offline and random order online contention resolution schemes, and (ii) monotone and non-monotone contention resolution schemes.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Towards an optimal contention resolution scheme for matchings

  • Pranav Nuti,
  • Jan Vondrák

摘要

In this paper, we study contention resolution schemes for matchings. Given a fractional matching x and a random set R(x) where each edge e appears independently with probability \(x_e\) x e , we want to select a matching \(M \subseteq R(x)\) M R ( x ) such that \(\Pr [e \in M \mid e \in R(x)] \ge c\) Pr [ e M e R ( x ) ] c , for c as large as possible. We call such a selection method a c-balanced contention resolution scheme. Our main results are (i) an asymptotically optimal \(\simeq 0.544\) 0.544 -balanced contention resolution scheme for general matchings when \(\Vert x\Vert _\infty \rightarrow 0\) x 0 , and (ii) a 0.509-balanced contention resolution scheme for bipartite matchings (without any restriction on x). To the best of our knowledge, this result establishes for the first time, in any natural relaxation of a combinatorial optimization problem, a separation between (i) offline and random order online contention resolution schemes, and (ii) monotone and non-monotone contention resolution schemes.