Scholarlink

Background <p>This study validated the Italian version of the In-Person Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (IP-TICS).</p> Methods <p>468 healthy Italian individuals (176 males; age: 57.5 ± 15.4, education: 13.2 ± 3.7) completed the TICS, IP-TICS, MMSE and MoCA. Correlational analyses explored the construct validity of the IP-TICS against the TICS, MMSE and MoCA. Hierarchical Confirmatory Factor Analyses tested the configural, metric and scalar invariance between the TICS and IP-TICS. Statistical equivalence was assessed <i>via</i> a two one-sided test (TOST) procedure. Equating norms were derived <i>via</i> log-linear smoothing equipercentile equating (LSEE) analyses, with TOST procedures assessing equivalence between empirical and LSEE-derived scores.</p> Results <p>The IP-TICS converged with the TICS, MMSE and MoCA, showing configural and metric invariance and equivalence with the TICS. Empirical and LSEE-derived scores were statistically equivalent.</p> Discussion <p>Findings support the convergence, equivalence and invariance between the TICS and the IP-TICS. The IP-TICS converges with established in-person screeners.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Validation of the Italian version of the In-Person Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (IP-TICS)

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月21日

查看全文
  • Edoardo Nicolò Aiello,
  • Elena Guidetti,
  • Giulia De Luca,
  • Francesca Frisco,
  • Beatrice Curti,
  • Arianna Moreschi,
  • Lorenzo Esposti,
  • Sara Casartelli,
  • Chiara Curatoli,
  • Alice Zanin,
  • Elisa Camporeale,
  • Martina Andrea Sirtori,
  • Federico Verde,
  • Vincenzo Silani,
  • Nicola Ticozzi,
  • Barbara Poletti,
  • Nadia Bolognini

摘要

Background

This study validated the Italian version of the In-Person Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (IP-TICS).

Methods

468 healthy Italian individuals (176 males; age: 57.5 ± 15.4, education: 13.2 ± 3.7) completed the TICS, IP-TICS, MMSE and MoCA. Correlational analyses explored the construct validity of the IP-TICS against the TICS, MMSE and MoCA. Hierarchical Confirmatory Factor Analyses tested the configural, metric and scalar invariance between the TICS and IP-TICS. Statistical equivalence was assessed via a two one-sided test (TOST) procedure. Equating norms were derived via log-linear smoothing equipercentile equating (LSEE) analyses, with TOST procedures assessing equivalence between empirical and LSEE-derived scores.

Results

The IP-TICS converged with the TICS, MMSE and MoCA, showing configural and metric invariance and equivalence with the TICS. Empirical and LSEE-derived scores were statistically equivalent.

Discussion

Findings support the convergence, equivalence and invariance between the TICS and the IP-TICS. The IP-TICS converges with established in-person screeners.