Objective <p>To assess the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in enhancing motor function recovery in the upper and lower extremities of individuals with multiple sclerosis.</p> Data sources <p>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and China Knowledge Network (CNKI) databases from inception until December 28, 2025.</p> Study selection <p>Randomized controlled trials that investigated transcranial direct current stimulation and tDCS combined with physical training on motor function in the upper and lower limbs of individuals with MS.</p> Data extraction <p>Two reviewers extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model based on heterogeneity. The analysis included 10 articles with a total of 299 subjects.</p> Data synthesis <p>The Meta-analysis shows tDCS significantly improves lower limb motor function in MS patients (SMD = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.16 − 0.46, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Subgroup analyses found significant increases in walking distance (<i>p</i> = 0.0005) and static balance (Berg Balance Score, <i>p</i> = 0.0002), but no significant improvements were observed in walking speed and dynamic balance. For upper limb motor function, no statistically significant difference was found in hand dexterity (9-HPT) (<i>p</i> = 0.11). Notably, subgroup analyses of stimulation parameters showed that high intensity (2.0–2.5&#xa0;mA, <i>p</i> = 0.007) and a 20-minute duration (<i>p</i> = 0.03) yielded significant effects, whereas low intensity (1.0–1.5&#xa0;mA) and 15-minute duration showed no significant benefits.</p> Conclusions <p>Transcranial direct current stimulation is effective in enhancing lower limb motor function in patients with MS. However, the efficacy of tDCS in improving upper limb fine motor skills remains unclear. Evidence suggests that stimulation at 2.0–2.5&#xa0;mA for 20&#xa0;min may be the optimal protocol for clinical intervention.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor function in patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Jinqiu Zhang,
  • You Wu,
  • Shuang Chen,
  • Yongan Wang

摘要

Objective

To assess the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in enhancing motor function recovery in the upper and lower extremities of individuals with multiple sclerosis.

Data sources

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and China Knowledge Network (CNKI) databases from inception until December 28, 2025.

Study selection

Randomized controlled trials that investigated transcranial direct current stimulation and tDCS combined with physical training on motor function in the upper and lower limbs of individuals with MS.

Data extraction

Two reviewers extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model based on heterogeneity. The analysis included 10 articles with a total of 299 subjects.

Data synthesis

The Meta-analysis shows tDCS significantly improves lower limb motor function in MS patients (SMD = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.16 − 0.46, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analyses found significant increases in walking distance (p = 0.0005) and static balance (Berg Balance Score, p = 0.0002), but no significant improvements were observed in walking speed and dynamic balance. For upper limb motor function, no statistically significant difference was found in hand dexterity (9-HPT) (p = 0.11). Notably, subgroup analyses of stimulation parameters showed that high intensity (2.0–2.5 mA, p = 0.007) and a 20-minute duration (p = 0.03) yielded significant effects, whereas low intensity (1.0–1.5 mA) and 15-minute duration showed no significant benefits.

Conclusions

Transcranial direct current stimulation is effective in enhancing lower limb motor function in patients with MS. However, the efficacy of tDCS in improving upper limb fine motor skills remains unclear. Evidence suggests that stimulation at 2.0–2.5 mA for 20 min may be the optimal protocol for clinical intervention.