Scholarlink

Introduction <p>It is suggested that survivors of different types of cancer may have an increased risk of stroke. Our study aims to evaluate cancer patients and non-cancer controls by analyzing stroke events in each group. Previous studies concluded that certain types of cancer increased stroke risk, however, their results had significant heterogeneity and statistical concerns.</p> Methods <p>Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched until February 18th, 2024, assessing stroke in cancer survivor patients compared to the global population. Data were examined using the Mantel-Haenszel method and 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics. Rstudio software, version 4.2.3., was used for statistical analysis.</p> Results <p>A total of 18 studies were included, and stroke was reported in both cancer and non-cancer groups. Breast cancer (HR 1.09; 95% CI 1.02–1.17; <i>p</i> = 0.01; I²= 0%), Central Nervous System cancers (HR 2.47; 95% CI 1.01–6.01; <i>p</i> = 0.047; I²= 78%), cervical cancers (HR 1.58; 95% CI 1.19–2.09; <i>p</i> = 0.001; I²= 0%), head and neck cancers (HR 1.4439; 95% CI 1.3095–1.5922; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; I²=31.5%), lung cancers (HR 1.60; 95% CI 1.40–1.83; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; I²=67%), multiple myeloma (HR 1.58; 95% CI 1.32–1.89; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; I²= 49%), nasopharyngeal cancers (HR 1.9178; 95% CI 1.3358–2.7533; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; I²=89.7%), oesophageal cancers (HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.07–1.65; <i>p</i> = 0.009; I²= 0%), ovarian cancers (HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.07–1.65; <i>p</i> = 0.01; I²= 38%), pancreatic cancers (HR 2,70; 95% CI 2.34–3.11; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; I²= 0%) and rectum cancers (HR 1.29; 95% CI 1.01–1.63; <i>p</i> = 0.04; I²= 0%) showed statistically significant differences between groups in favor of non-cancer controls.</p> Conclusions <p>In this meta-analysis, the stroke risk was increased in all cancers that reached statistical significance. Furthermore, our study brings relevant data to the body of literature concerning this long-term clinical uncertainty.</p> Graphic abstract <p></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Stroke risk in cancer survivors: A meta-analysis and meta regression

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月19日

查看全文
  • Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes,
  • Gustavo Tadeu Freitas Uchôa Matheus,
  • Maria Eduarda Cavalcanti Souza,
  • Artur Menegaz de Almeida,
  • Ocílio de Deus da Rocha Ribeiro Gonçalves,
  • Anna Lydia Machado Silva,
  • Lucas Bresciani Padilha,
  • Francinny Alves Kelly,
  • Rommel Mario Rodríguez Burbano

摘要

Introduction

It is suggested that survivors of different types of cancer may have an increased risk of stroke. Our study aims to evaluate cancer patients and non-cancer controls by analyzing stroke events in each group. Previous studies concluded that certain types of cancer increased stroke risk, however, their results had significant heterogeneity and statistical concerns.

Methods

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched until February 18th, 2024, assessing stroke in cancer survivor patients compared to the global population. Data were examined using the Mantel-Haenszel method and 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics. Rstudio software, version 4.2.3., was used for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 18 studies were included, and stroke was reported in both cancer and non-cancer groups. Breast cancer (HR 1.09; 95% CI 1.02–1.17; p = 0.01; I²= 0%), Central Nervous System cancers (HR 2.47; 95% CI 1.01–6.01; p = 0.047; I²= 78%), cervical cancers (HR 1.58; 95% CI 1.19–2.09; p = 0.001; I²= 0%), head and neck cancers (HR 1.4439; 95% CI 1.3095–1.5922; p < 0.001; I²=31.5%), lung cancers (HR 1.60; 95% CI 1.40–1.83; p < 0.001; I²=67%), multiple myeloma (HR 1.58; 95% CI 1.32–1.89; p < 0.001; I²= 49%), nasopharyngeal cancers (HR 1.9178; 95% CI 1.3358–2.7533; p < 0.001; I²=89.7%), oesophageal cancers (HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.07–1.65; p = 0.009; I²= 0%), ovarian cancers (HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.07–1.65; p = 0.01; I²= 38%), pancreatic cancers (HR 2,70; 95% CI 2.34–3.11; p < 0.001; I²= 0%) and rectum cancers (HR 1.29; 95% CI 1.01–1.63; p = 0.04; I²= 0%) showed statistically significant differences between groups in favor of non-cancer controls.

Conclusions

In this meta-analysis, the stroke risk was increased in all cancers that reached statistical significance. Furthermore, our study brings relevant data to the body of literature concerning this long-term clinical uncertainty.

Graphic abstract