<p>Human languages use complex, structured signals whose meanings are compositional. Recent empirical research has claimed to demonstrate compositionality in bird and primate communication (Berthet et al. <CitationRef CitationID="CR2">2025</CitationRef>; Engesser et al. <CitationRef CitationID="CR4">2016</CitationRef>; Girard-Buttoz et al. <CitationRef CitationID="CR6">2025</CitationRef>; Leroux et al. <CitationRef CitationID="CR8">2023</CitationRef>; Suzuki et al. <CitationRef CitationID="CR21">2017</CitationRef>). While the compositionality of human languages seems beyond doubt, it can be demonstrated powerfully and immediately because of several other important features of language. Clarifying the arguments for compositionality in human languages reveals open questions and alternative hypotheses about the evidence from other species, and directions for further research and possible limitations.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Compositionality in human and animal communication

  • Nathan Klinedinst

摘要

Human languages use complex, structured signals whose meanings are compositional. Recent empirical research has claimed to demonstrate compositionality in bird and primate communication (Berthet et al. 2025; Engesser et al. 2016; Girard-Buttoz et al. 2025; Leroux et al. 2023; Suzuki et al. 2017). While the compositionality of human languages seems beyond doubt, it can be demonstrated powerfully and immediately because of several other important features of language. Clarifying the arguments for compositionality in human languages reveals open questions and alternative hypotheses about the evidence from other species, and directions for further research and possible limitations.