Objectives <p>This study aimed to determine whether there are differences in biologic treatment and complications according to subgroups of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients in adulthood.</p> Method <p>HUR-BIO (Hacettepe University Rheumatology Biologic Registry) has been a single-center biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug registry since 2005. Patients were selected from HUR-BIO who met the International League of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria for juvenile idiopathic arthritis.</p> Results <p>Enthesitis-related arthritis (82, 49.1%), rheumatoid factor (-) polyarthritis (39, 23.4%), and rheumatoid factor ( +) polyarthritis (26, 15.6%) were the most prevalent subgroups in 167 JIA patients. Etanercept (105, 62.9%), adalimumab (28, 16.8%), and infliximab (21, 12.6%) were the most prescribed first-line biologic drugs. Secondary failure was the most common reason for the treatment changes among 42 (43.3%) patients, followed by non-life-threatening side effects in 12 (12.4%) and primary failure in 11 (11.3%). Polyarticular JIA showed higher HAQ (<i>p</i> = 0.020) and DAS28-ESR (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) before biologics and had a longer disease duration to initiation of biologic treatment than enthesitis-related arthritis (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Only one patient (1.2%) in the enthesitis-related arthritis group needed the hip prosthesis, while 12 patients (18.5%) in the polyarticular JIA group required the same procedure (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p> Conclusions <p>In adult rheumatology departments, the most common JIAs present with ongoing disease are enthesitis-related arthritis and polyarthritis. Secondary failure was the main reason nearly half of the patients needed biologic changes during follow-up. The polyarticular group appears to have a higher disease severity and level of disability.<Table Float="No" ID="Taba"> <tgroup cols="2"> <colspec align="justify" colname="c1" colnum="1" /> <colspec align="justify" colname="c2" colnum="2" /> <tbody> <row> <entry nameend="c2" namest="c1"> <p><b>Key Points</b></p> <p>• <i>The most of juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients in adult rheumatology clinics require biologics are enthesitis-related arthritis and polyarticular arthritis.</i></p> <p>• <i>Approximately half of the patients require biologic changes during follow-up, most of these due to secondary failure.</i></p> <p>• <i>Disease severity and disability appear to be higher in the polyarticular group, therefore treatment intensification may be considered.</i></p> </entry> </row> </tbody> </tgroup> </Table></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Use of biologic drugs in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients followed in an adult rheumatology clinic: real-life data from the HUR-BIO biologic registry

  • Emine Büşra Ata,
  • Levent Kılıç,
  • Büşra Fırlatan Yazgan,
  • Sevgi Gözde Kart Bayram,
  • Mustafa Ekici,
  • Erdinç Ünaldı,
  • Ali Aytuğ Kuştaş,
  • Buğu Bulat,
  • Ömer Karadağ,
  • Ali Akdoğan,
  • Şule Apraş Bilgen,
  • Sedat Kiraz,
  • İhsan Ertenli,
  • Yelda Bilginer,
  • Seza Özen,
  • Umut Kalyoncu

摘要

Objectives

This study aimed to determine whether there are differences in biologic treatment and complications according to subgroups of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients in adulthood.

Method

HUR-BIO (Hacettepe University Rheumatology Biologic Registry) has been a single-center biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug registry since 2005. Patients were selected from HUR-BIO who met the International League of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria for juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Results

Enthesitis-related arthritis (82, 49.1%), rheumatoid factor (-) polyarthritis (39, 23.4%), and rheumatoid factor ( +) polyarthritis (26, 15.6%) were the most prevalent subgroups in 167 JIA patients. Etanercept (105, 62.9%), adalimumab (28, 16.8%), and infliximab (21, 12.6%) were the most prescribed first-line biologic drugs. Secondary failure was the most common reason for the treatment changes among 42 (43.3%) patients, followed by non-life-threatening side effects in 12 (12.4%) and primary failure in 11 (11.3%). Polyarticular JIA showed higher HAQ (p = 0.020) and DAS28-ESR (p < 0.001) before biologics and had a longer disease duration to initiation of biologic treatment than enthesitis-related arthritis (p < 0.001). Only one patient (1.2%) in the enthesitis-related arthritis group needed the hip prosthesis, while 12 patients (18.5%) in the polyarticular JIA group required the same procedure (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In adult rheumatology departments, the most common JIAs present with ongoing disease are enthesitis-related arthritis and polyarthritis. Secondary failure was the main reason nearly half of the patients needed biologic changes during follow-up. The polyarticular group appears to have a higher disease severity and level of disability.

Key Points

The most of juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients in adult rheumatology clinics require biologics are enthesitis-related arthritis and polyarticular arthritis.

Approximately half of the patients require biologic changes during follow-up, most of these due to secondary failure.

Disease severity and disability appear to be higher in the polyarticular group, therefore treatment intensification may be considered.