<p>The deformation modulus of rocks is usually estimated only by compression tests. However, most rocks show bi-modular behavior, consisting of deformation modulus having different values in compression and tension; usually in compression the deformation modulus is greater than tension. Due to the direct tensile test being a more complex test to carry out, the tensile strength is usually estimated by the indirect tensile test (Brazilian test). Consequently, there are researchers who propose methods estimating the tensile deformation modulus with the Brazilian test. In the present paper, the deformation modulus of Porto granite samples with different densities (weathering degree) was obtained in three different ways: in the uniaxial compression test, in the direct tensile test, and in the Brazilian test (diametric load) and then compared. From the results, it is concluded that in general the deformation modulus obtain only by the Brazilian test cannot be considered representative of direct traction.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

An experimental study of tensile deformation modulus obtained with the Brazilian test and direct tensile test

  • Ana Teresa Santos de Alencar,
  • Rubén Galindo,
  • Antonio Viana da Fonseca,
  • Mauro Muñiz-Menéndez,
  • Rita Isabel Rocha da Lamas

摘要

The deformation modulus of rocks is usually estimated only by compression tests. However, most rocks show bi-modular behavior, consisting of deformation modulus having different values in compression and tension; usually in compression the deformation modulus is greater than tension. Due to the direct tensile test being a more complex test to carry out, the tensile strength is usually estimated by the indirect tensile test (Brazilian test). Consequently, there are researchers who propose methods estimating the tensile deformation modulus with the Brazilian test. In the present paper, the deformation modulus of Porto granite samples with different densities (weathering degree) was obtained in three different ways: in the uniaxial compression test, in the direct tensile test, and in the Brazilian test (diametric load) and then compared. From the results, it is concluded that in general the deformation modulus obtain only by the Brazilian test cannot be considered representative of direct traction.