Scholarlink

Purpose <p>Currently, no standardized, low-cost, and portable method is available for assessing abdominal wall strength in patients with incisional hernias, addressing the limitations of traditional dynamometry.</p> Methods <p>This cross-sectional validation study compared the HerniaCare Lab device performance with the Activforce 2 hand-held dynamometer in92 adults diagnosed with abdominal wall hernias. Isometric trunk flexion strength was measured under identical conditions, and agreement between devices was analyzed using non-parametric tests, correlation, and concordance statistics.</p> Results <p>The HerniaCare Lab showed systematically higher strength values than the Activforce 2 (mean difference = + 22.3 N, p &lt; 0.001) but demonstrated a very strong positive correlation (ρ = 0.95, p &lt; 0.001) and good concordance (CCC = 0.89). Bland–Altman analysis revealed a mean bias of + 24.9 N with 95% limits of agreement from − 17.7 to+ 67.5 N, and a slight proportional bias at higher force levels.</p> Conclusion <p>Despite predictable overestimation, the HerniaCare Lab exhibits strong concurrent validity and good agreement with an established reference device, supporting its potential clinical utility for objective, reproducible, and accessible assessment of abdominal wall strength in surgical populations.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Concurrent validity and agreement of the HerniaCare Lab device for abdominal wall strength assessment

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月10日

查看全文
  • José Luis Gil Delgado,
  • Carlos Rangel Cascajosa,
  • Alejandro Sánchez Arteaga,
  • Luis Tallón Aguilar,
  • Borja Sañudo Corrales

摘要

Purpose

Currently, no standardized, low-cost, and portable method is available for assessing abdominal wall strength in patients with incisional hernias, addressing the limitations of traditional dynamometry.

Methods

This cross-sectional validation study compared the HerniaCare Lab device performance with the Activforce 2 hand-held dynamometer in92 adults diagnosed with abdominal wall hernias. Isometric trunk flexion strength was measured under identical conditions, and agreement between devices was analyzed using non-parametric tests, correlation, and concordance statistics.

Results

The HerniaCare Lab showed systematically higher strength values than the Activforce 2 (mean difference = + 22.3 N, p < 0.001) but demonstrated a very strong positive correlation (ρ = 0.95, p < 0.001) and good concordance (CCC = 0.89). Bland–Altman analysis revealed a mean bias of + 24.9 N with 95% limits of agreement from − 17.7 to+ 67.5 N, and a slight proportional bias at higher force levels.

Conclusion

Despite predictable overestimation, the HerniaCare Lab exhibits strong concurrent validity and good agreement with an established reference device, supporting its potential clinical utility for objective, reproducible, and accessible assessment of abdominal wall strength in surgical populations.