<p>Let <i>t</i> be indeterminate and let <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\rho : B_n \rightarrow GL_{m}(\mathbb {Z}[t^{\pm 1}])\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>ρ</mi> <mo>:</mo> <msub> <mi>B</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <mi>G</mi> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mi>m</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <msup> <mi>t</mi> <mrow> <mo>±</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> be a <i>k</i>-local representation of the braid group <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(B_n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>B</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, where <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(k=m-n+2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi>m</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We consider two types of extensions of <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\rho \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>ρ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> to the singular braid monoid <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(SM_n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The first type is called the <i>k</i>-local extension, which is a new concept we defined in this paper. The second type is called the <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Phi \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-type extension, which is given by Bardakov, Chbili, and Kozlovskaya in (Mediterr. J. Math. 21: 180, 2024). In order to obtain a relation between these two types of extensions, we consider two homogeneous 2-local representations of <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(B_n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>B</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, namely <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\rho _B: B_n \rightarrow GL_{n}(\mathbb {Z}[t^{\pm 1}])\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ρ</mi> <mi>B</mi> </msub> <mo>:</mo> <msub> <mi>B</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <mi>G</mi> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <msup> <mi>t</mi> <mrow> <mo>±</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\rho _S: B_n \rightarrow GL_{n}(\mathbb {Z}[t^{\pm 1}])\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ρ</mi> <mi>S</mi> </msub> <mo>:</mo> <msub> <mi>B</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <mi>G</mi> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <msup> <mi>t</mi> <mrow> <mo>±</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and a homogeneous 3-local representation of <InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(B_n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>B</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, namely <InlineEquation ID="IEq18"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\rho _F: B_n \rightarrow GL_{n+1}(\mathbb {Z}[t^{\pm 1}])\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ρ</mi> <mi>F</mi> </msub> <mo>:</mo> <msub> <mi>B</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <mi>G</mi> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <msup> <mi>t</mi> <mrow> <mo>±</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We study the relation between the two types of extensions to <InlineEquation ID="IEq19"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(SM_n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> of these three representations of <InlineEquation ID="IEq20"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(B_n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>B</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. In fact, we prove that every homogeneous 2-local extension of <InlineEquation ID="IEq21"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\rho _B\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>ρ</mi> <mi>B</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is also a <InlineEquation ID="IEq22"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Phi \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-type extension for all <InlineEquation ID="IEq23"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n\ge 2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>; which is not the case for <InlineEquation ID="IEq24"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\rho _S\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>ρ</mi> <mi>S</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Also, we prove that every homogeneous 3-local extension of <InlineEquation ID="IEq25"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\rho _F\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>ρ</mi> <mi>F</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is a <InlineEquation ID="IEq26"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Phi \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-type extension for all <InlineEquation ID="IEq27"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n\ge 3\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. In addition, we study, in the case <InlineEquation ID="IEq28"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n=2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, the faithfulness of the complex specialization of all 2-local extensions of <InlineEquation ID="IEq29"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\rho _B\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>ρ</mi> <mi>B</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq30"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\rho _S\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>ρ</mi> <mi>S</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Local Extensions and \(\Phi \)-Type Extensions of Some Local Representations of the Braid Group \(B_n\) to the Singular Braid Monoid \(SM_n\)

  • Mohamad N. Nasser

摘要

Let t be indeterminate and let \(\rho : B_n \rightarrow GL_{m}(\mathbb {Z}[t^{\pm 1}])\) ρ : B n G L m ( Z [ t ± 1 ] ) be a k-local representation of the braid group \(B_n\) B n , where \(k=m-n+2\) k = m - n + 2 . We consider two types of extensions of \(\rho \) ρ to the singular braid monoid \(SM_n\) S M n . The first type is called the k-local extension, which is a new concept we defined in this paper. The second type is called the \(\Phi \) Φ -type extension, which is given by Bardakov, Chbili, and Kozlovskaya in (Mediterr. J. Math. 21: 180, 2024). In order to obtain a relation between these two types of extensions, we consider two homogeneous 2-local representations of \(B_n\) B n , namely \(\rho _B: B_n \rightarrow GL_{n}(\mathbb {Z}[t^{\pm 1}])\) ρ B : B n G L n ( Z [ t ± 1 ] ) and \(\rho _S: B_n \rightarrow GL_{n}(\mathbb {Z}[t^{\pm 1}])\) ρ S : B n G L n ( Z [ t ± 1 ] ) , and a homogeneous 3-local representation of \(B_n\) B n , namely \(\rho _F: B_n \rightarrow GL_{n+1}(\mathbb {Z}[t^{\pm 1}])\) ρ F : B n G L n + 1 ( Z [ t ± 1 ] ) . We study the relation between the two types of extensions to \(SM_n\) S M n of these three representations of \(B_n\) B n . In fact, we prove that every homogeneous 2-local extension of \(\rho _B\) ρ B is also a \(\Phi \) Φ -type extension for all \(n\ge 2\) n 2 ; which is not the case for \(\rho _S\) ρ S . Also, we prove that every homogeneous 3-local extension of \(\rho _F\) ρ F is a \(\Phi \) Φ -type extension for all \(n\ge 3\) n 3 . In addition, we study, in the case \(n=2\) n = 2 , the faithfulness of the complex specialization of all 2-local extensions of \(\rho _B\) ρ B and \(\rho _S\) ρ S .