Scholarlink

Background <p>Salivary gland tumors primarily arise in the parotid gland with surgery representing the cornerstone of treatment. Parotidectomies often lead to a soft tissue deficit that may benefit from reconstruction to reduce incidence of Frey’s syndrome, improve aesthetic outcomes, and allow for appropriate postoperative therapies. Several options exist including avascular tissue transfer, locoregional tissue flaps, and microvascular free flaps.</p> Methods <p>This paper is a literature review exploring the efficacy of the various reconstructive options, and includes randomized control trials, prospective studies, and retrospective studies from 1999 to 2024.</p> Results <p>The literature demonstrates that any reconstructive option is superior to no reconstruction in reducing the risk of FS and in improving cosmetic outcomes without increasing the risk of postoperative complications including hematomas and sialoceles.</p> Conclusions <p>While literature demonstrates that reconstruction is beneficial in parotidectomies, the existing literature does not provide an adequate comparison of options to guide surgeons in making an informed choice.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Soft tissue augmentation options for volume replacement following parotidectomy: A review of the literature

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月23日

查看全文
  • Udit Vyas,
  • Isabella Benintendi,
  • Mac Kenzie Reece,
  • Mohamedkazim Alwani,
  • R. Michael Johnson,
  • Mark Wax,
  • Sameep Kadakia

摘要

Background

Salivary gland tumors primarily arise in the parotid gland with surgery representing the cornerstone of treatment. Parotidectomies often lead to a soft tissue deficit that may benefit from reconstruction to reduce incidence of Frey’s syndrome, improve aesthetic outcomes, and allow for appropriate postoperative therapies. Several options exist including avascular tissue transfer, locoregional tissue flaps, and microvascular free flaps.

Methods

This paper is a literature review exploring the efficacy of the various reconstructive options, and includes randomized control trials, prospective studies, and retrospective studies from 1999 to 2024.

Results

The literature demonstrates that any reconstructive option is superior to no reconstruction in reducing the risk of FS and in improving cosmetic outcomes without increasing the risk of postoperative complications including hematomas and sialoceles.

Conclusions

While literature demonstrates that reconstruction is beneficial in parotidectomies, the existing literature does not provide an adequate comparison of options to guide surgeons in making an informed choice.