Objective <p>To evaluate the effect of polishing systems on the color and roughness of conventional and bulk-fill nanofilled resins, compared to conventional and bulk-fill nano-hybrid resins with S-PRG fillers.</p> Materials and methods <p>Discs (<i>n</i> = 12) were fabricated from the following resin composites: conventional nanofilled resin (Filtek Z350 XT, 3&#xa0;M), bulk-fill nanofilled resin (Filtek One Bulk-Fill, 3&#xa0;M), conventional nano-hybrid resin with S-PRG fillers (Beautifil II LS, Shofu), and bulk-fill nano-hybrid resin with S-PRG filler (Beautifil Bulk Restorative, Shofu). Polishing was conducted using multi-grit aluminum oxide abrasive discs (Sof-Lex Pop On, 3&#xa0;M) or a single-grit aluminum oxide tip (OneGloss, Shofu). Roughness (Ra) and color (CIEL*a*b*, ΔE<sub>ab</sub> and ΔE<sub>00</sub>) were assessed at baseline, post-polishing, and post-coffee staining. Surface micromorphology was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).</p> Results <p>Roughness increased after polishing with the aluminum oxide tip for all materials (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001; Mann–Whitney). Bulk-fill nanofilled resin showed increased roughness, while conventional nano-hybrid resin with S-PRG filler showed decreased roughness after multi-grit disc polishing (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001; Mann–Whitney). Coffee staining significantly increased the roughness in resin composites with S-PRG filler (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001; Mann–Whitney). All resin composites exhibited reduced L* and b* (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05; generalized linear mixed models for repeated measures) and increased a* (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05; Friedman and Nemenyi) values after coffee staining. ΔE<sub>ab</sub> and ΔE<sub>00</sub> were significantly higher for bulk-fill nano-hybrid containing S-PRG filler, irrespective of polishing type (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001; Friedman and Nemenyi). SEM analysis revealed surface degradation and/or particle loss in resin composites with S-PRG filler (conventional and bulk-fill) post-polishing. Single-grit polishing resulted in greater surface irregularities across all resins.</p> Conclusion <p>Polishing systems significantly influence resin composite roughness based on their composition, with single-grit polishing causing the highest roughness. Bulk-fill nano-hybrid resin composite with S-PRG filler exhibited the greatest color and roughness changes post-staining.</p> Clinical relevance <p>Bulk-fill resin composite with S-PRG filler demonstrated lower color and surface stability. Importantly, these changes were significantly mitigated when polished using a multi-stage polishing system.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Effect of polishing systems on the roughness, color, and staining of conventional and bulk-fill resin composites with and without S-PRG filler

  • Eliane Noriko Takahashi Moreira,
  • Waldemir Francisco Vieira-Junior,
  • Cecilia Pedroso Turssi,
  • Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França,
  • Roberta Tarkany Basting

摘要

Objective

To evaluate the effect of polishing systems on the color and roughness of conventional and bulk-fill nanofilled resins, compared to conventional and bulk-fill nano-hybrid resins with S-PRG fillers.

Materials and methods

Discs (n = 12) were fabricated from the following resin composites: conventional nanofilled resin (Filtek Z350 XT, 3 M), bulk-fill nanofilled resin (Filtek One Bulk-Fill, 3 M), conventional nano-hybrid resin with S-PRG fillers (Beautifil II LS, Shofu), and bulk-fill nano-hybrid resin with S-PRG filler (Beautifil Bulk Restorative, Shofu). Polishing was conducted using multi-grit aluminum oxide abrasive discs (Sof-Lex Pop On, 3 M) or a single-grit aluminum oxide tip (OneGloss, Shofu). Roughness (Ra) and color (CIEL*a*b*, ΔEab and ΔE00) were assessed at baseline, post-polishing, and post-coffee staining. Surface micromorphology was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Results

Roughness increased after polishing with the aluminum oxide tip for all materials (p < 0.0001; Mann–Whitney). Bulk-fill nanofilled resin showed increased roughness, while conventional nano-hybrid resin with S-PRG filler showed decreased roughness after multi-grit disc polishing (p < 0.0001; Mann–Whitney). Coffee staining significantly increased the roughness in resin composites with S-PRG filler (p < 0.0001; Mann–Whitney). All resin composites exhibited reduced L* and b* (p < 0.05; generalized linear mixed models for repeated measures) and increased a* (p < 0.05; Friedman and Nemenyi) values after coffee staining. ΔEab and ΔE00 were significantly higher for bulk-fill nano-hybrid containing S-PRG filler, irrespective of polishing type (p < 0.0001; Friedman and Nemenyi). SEM analysis revealed surface degradation and/or particle loss in resin composites with S-PRG filler (conventional and bulk-fill) post-polishing. Single-grit polishing resulted in greater surface irregularities across all resins.

Conclusion

Polishing systems significantly influence resin composite roughness based on their composition, with single-grit polishing causing the highest roughness. Bulk-fill nano-hybrid resin composite with S-PRG filler exhibited the greatest color and roughness changes post-staining.

Clinical relevance

Bulk-fill resin composite with S-PRG filler demonstrated lower color and surface stability. Importantly, these changes were significantly mitigated when polished using a multi-stage polishing system.