<p>When high-level radioactive waste is emplaced in a rock mass with minor faults, it is necessary to consider the risk of shear displacement along them as this might damage engineered barriers surrounding the waste materials. When the shear compliance of the faults is high, large elastic shear displacement might occur along them due to hydromechanical changes after the emplacement. However, their shear compliance is usually assumed to be low (≤ 10<sup>−1</sup>&#xa0;mm/MPa). To verify such assumption, we investigated a minor fault at a depth of ~ 480&#xa0;m in soft siliceous mudstone. We grouted it and investigated drillcores and borehole-wall images, which revealed that the borehole axis in the footwall was displaced by ~ 26&#xa0;mm relative to the hanging wall as a result of ~ 44&#xa0;mm of reverse motion on the&#xa0;57°-dipping fault. We interpret this displacement as backward elastic shear displacement because (1) the water pressure in the borehole was 0.8–3.1&#xa0;MPa lower than the formation pressure; (2) a reduction in water pressure can reduce the shear compliance of a fault, decreasing previously generated elastic shear displacement; and (3) this interpretation is consistent with the normal faulting stress state around the fault. The induced shear displacement and calculated shear stress on the fault yield a high shear compliance (≥ 10<sup>1</sup>&#xa0;mm/MPa). This study demonstrates that the shear compliance of minor faults&#xa0;is not always low; therefore, it is necessary to evaluate it using in-situ investigations so that elastic shear displacement after the emplacement does not severely damage the engineered barriers.</p><p><b>Highlights</b><UnorderedList Mark="Bullet"> <ItemContent> <p>Observational data show an elastic shear displacement of ~ 44&#xa0;mm along a fault</p> </ItemContent> <ItemContent> <p>This backward elastic shear displacement was caused by reduced water pressure</p> </ItemContent> <ItemContent> <p>The estimated shear compliance of the fault was high (≥ 10<sup>1</sup>&#xa0;mm/MPa)</p> </ItemContent> </UnorderedList></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Observational Evidence of Elastic Shear Displacement Along a Minor Fault in Soft Siliceous Mudstone

  • Tomonori Tamura,
  • Eiichi Ishii,
  • Kazuhei Aoyagi,
  • Keisuke Yagi

摘要

When high-level radioactive waste is emplaced in a rock mass with minor faults, it is necessary to consider the risk of shear displacement along them as this might damage engineered barriers surrounding the waste materials. When the shear compliance of the faults is high, large elastic shear displacement might occur along them due to hydromechanical changes after the emplacement. However, their shear compliance is usually assumed to be low (≤ 10−1 mm/MPa). To verify such assumption, we investigated a minor fault at a depth of ~ 480 m in soft siliceous mudstone. We grouted it and investigated drillcores and borehole-wall images, which revealed that the borehole axis in the footwall was displaced by ~ 26 mm relative to the hanging wall as a result of ~ 44 mm of reverse motion on the 57°-dipping fault. We interpret this displacement as backward elastic shear displacement because (1) the water pressure in the borehole was 0.8–3.1 MPa lower than the formation pressure; (2) a reduction in water pressure can reduce the shear compliance of a fault, decreasing previously generated elastic shear displacement; and (3) this interpretation is consistent with the normal faulting stress state around the fault. The induced shear displacement and calculated shear stress on the fault yield a high shear compliance (≥ 101 mm/MPa). This study demonstrates that the shear compliance of minor faults is not always low; therefore, it is necessary to evaluate it using in-situ investigations so that elastic shear displacement after the emplacement does not severely damage the engineered barriers.

Highlights

Observational data show an elastic shear displacement of ~ 44 mm along a fault

This backward elastic shear displacement was caused by reduced water pressure

The estimated shear compliance of the fault was high (≥ 101 mm/MPa)