<p>We apply the calculable <i>R</i>-matrix method to determine the cross sections of the <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{12,13}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mrow> <mn>12</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>13</mn> </mrow> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>C(<InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(p,\gamma \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>γ</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>)<InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{13,14}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mrow> <mn>13</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>14</mn> </mrow> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>N reactions using both local Woods-Saxon (WS) and nonlocal Perey-Buck (PB) potentials. Benchmark calculations are first performed for the <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{12}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>12</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>C(<InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(p,\gamma \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>γ</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>)<InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{13}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>13</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>N reaction, and the results show good agreement with the standard codes FRESCO and RADCAP, as well as with recent calculations in other works. Furthermore, the method is applied to investigate the <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{13}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>13</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>C(<InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(p,\gamma \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>γ</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>)<InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{14}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>14</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>N reaction. Analysis of the astrophysical <i>S</i>-factors for both reactions indicates no significant difference between the local and nonlocal potential calculations, with discrepancies limited to approximately 7%–8%. The successful application of the calculable <i>R</i>-matrix method to these <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((p,\gamma )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>γ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> processes provides a framework for future studies involving nonlocal potentials derived from microscopic models.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Application of the Calculable R-matrix to Study the \(^{12,13}\)C(p,\(\gamma \))\(^{13,14}\)N Reaction

  • Nguyen Hoang Phuc,
  • Nguyen Tri Toan Phuc,
  • Do Cong Cuong

摘要

We apply the calculable R-matrix method to determine the cross sections of the \(^{12,13}\) 12 , 13 C( \(p,\gamma \) p , γ ) \(^{13,14}\) 13 , 14 N reactions using both local Woods-Saxon (WS) and nonlocal Perey-Buck (PB) potentials. Benchmark calculations are first performed for the \(^{12}\) 12 C( \(p,\gamma \) p , γ ) \(^{13}\) 13 N reaction, and the results show good agreement with the standard codes FRESCO and RADCAP, as well as with recent calculations in other works. Furthermore, the method is applied to investigate the \(^{13}\) 13 C( \(p,\gamma \) p , γ ) \(^{14}\) 14 N reaction. Analysis of the astrophysical S-factors for both reactions indicates no significant difference between the local and nonlocal potential calculations, with discrepancies limited to approximately 7%–8%. The successful application of the calculable R-matrix method to these \((p,\gamma )\) ( p , γ ) processes provides a framework for future studies involving nonlocal potentials derived from microscopic models.