<p>In the present study, we consider the hydrogen atom confined within an impenetrable infinite cylindrical cavity of radius <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="601_2025_2001_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="12" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="17" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\rho _{0}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>ρ</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> in the presence of a constant magnetic field <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="601_2025_2001_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="15" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="62" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textbf{B} = B\,\hat{\textbf{z}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold">B</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi>B</mi> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mover accent="true"> <mi mathvariant="bold">z</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> oriented along the main cylinder’s axis. In the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, anchoring the nucleus to the geometric center of the cylinder, a physically meaningful 3-parametric trial function is used to determine the ground state energy <i>E</i> of the system. This trial function incorporates the exact symmetries and key limiting behaviors of the problem explicitly. In particular, it does not treat the Coulomb potential nor the magnetic interaction as a <i>perturbation</i>. The novel inclusion of a variational cut-off factor <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="601_2025_2001_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="25" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="83" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\big (1 - \big (\frac{\rho }{\rho _0}\big )^\nu \big )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mrow> <mo maxsize="1.2em" minsize="1.2em" stretchy="true">(</mo> </mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>-</mo> <mrow> <mo maxsize="1.2em" minsize="1.2em" stretchy="true">(</mo> </mrow> <mfrac> <mi>ρ</mi> <msub> <mi>ρ</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </mfrac> <msup> <mrow> <mo maxsize="1.2em" minsize="1.2em" stretchy="true">)</mo> </mrow> <mi>ν</mi> </msup> <mrow> <mo maxsize="1.2em" minsize="1.2em" stretchy="true">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="601_2025_2001_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="15" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="42" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\nu \ge 1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>ν</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, appears to represent a significant improvement compared to the non-variational cut-off factors commonly employed in the literature. The dependence of the total energy <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="601_2025_2001_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="102" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(E=E(\rho _0,\,B)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi>E</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>ρ</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mi>B</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and the binding energy <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="601_2025_2001_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="111" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(E_b=E_b(\rho _0,\,B)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>E</mi> <mi>b</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mi>E</mi> <mi>b</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>ρ</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mi>B</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> on the cavity radius <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="601_2025_2001_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="86" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\rho _0 \in [0.8,\,5] \,\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ρ</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> <mo>∈</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mn>0.8</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mn>5</mn> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>a.u. and the magnetic field strength <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="601_2025_2001_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="96" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(B\in [0.0,\,1.0]\,\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>B</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mn>0.0</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mn>1.0</mn> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>a.u. is presented in detail. The expectation values <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="601_2025_2001_Article_IEq9.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="28" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\langle \rho \rangle \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">⟨</mo> <mi>ρ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">⟩</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="601_2025_2001_Article_IEq10.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="38" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\langle |z| \rangle \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">⟨</mo> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi>z</mi> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mo stretchy="false">⟩</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and the Shannon entropy in position space are computed to provide additional insights into the system’s localization. A brief discussion is provided comparing the 2D and 3D cases as well.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Cylindrically Confined Hydrogen Atom in Magnetic Field: Variational Cut-Off Factor

  • A. N. Mendoza-Tavera,
  • H. Olivares-Pilón,
  • M. Rodríguez-Arcos,
  • A. M. Escobar-Ruiz

摘要

In the present study, we consider the hydrogen atom confined within an impenetrable infinite cylindrical cavity of radius \(\rho _{0}\) ρ 0 in the presence of a constant magnetic field \(\textbf{B} = B\,\hat{\textbf{z}}\) B = B z ^ oriented along the main cylinder’s axis. In the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, anchoring the nucleus to the geometric center of the cylinder, a physically meaningful 3-parametric trial function is used to determine the ground state energy E of the system. This trial function incorporates the exact symmetries and key limiting behaviors of the problem explicitly. In particular, it does not treat the Coulomb potential nor the magnetic interaction as a perturbation. The novel inclusion of a variational cut-off factor \(\big (1 - \big (\frac{\rho }{\rho _0}\big )^\nu \big )\) ( 1 - ( ρ ρ 0 ) ν ) , \(\nu \ge 1\) ν 1 , appears to represent a significant improvement compared to the non-variational cut-off factors commonly employed in the literature. The dependence of the total energy \(E=E(\rho _0,\,B)\) E = E ( ρ 0 , B ) and the binding energy \(E_b=E_b(\rho _0,\,B)\) E b = E b ( ρ 0 , B ) on the cavity radius \(\rho _0 \in [0.8,\,5] \,\) ρ 0 [ 0.8 , 5 ] a.u. and the magnetic field strength \(B\in [0.0,\,1.0]\,\) B [ 0.0 , 1.0 ] a.u. is presented in detail. The expectation values \(\langle \rho \rangle \) ρ and \(\langle |z| \rangle \) | z | , and the Shannon entropy in position space are computed to provide additional insights into the system’s localization. A brief discussion is provided comparing the 2D and 3D cases as well.