Purpose <p>To compare the safety of the medial and inferior approaches in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and assess their suitability for early career surgeons.</p> Methods <p>In this multicenter cohort study, 289 patients who underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy at 21 institutions were analyzed using propensity score matching. The outcomes of the medial and inferior approaches were compared in the overall cohort and in cases performed by early career surgeons (≤ 12 postgraduate years).</p> Results <p>In the overall cohort (medial, n = 119; inferior, n = 170), no significant differences were observed in the intraoperative or postoperative complication rates, operative time, or blood loss. Among early career surgeons (medial, n = 42; inferior, n = 99), the medial approach was associated with a lower incidence of postoperative complications (OR 0.25; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.93; p = 0.037) and a shorter operative time (β = -21.75 min, 95% CI -40.57 to -0.94; p = 0.040).</p> Conclusion <p>For early career surgeons, the medial approach was associated with a lower risk of postoperative complications and a shorter operative time. These findings support the educational value of this technique and suggest that prioritizing it in early surgical training may enhance perioperative safety and inform surgical training curricula.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Medial vs. inferior approach in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a comparative study of the perioperative outcomes for early-career surgeons

  • Reimi Kawagoe,
  • Nobuki Ichikawa,
  • Tatsushi Shimokuni,
  • Shin Emoto,
  • Yui Ishiguro,
  • Asao Tamanaha,
  • Yasutomo Fukasaku,
  • Takahiro Oshima,
  • Michio Tani,
  • Shuhei Kii,
  • Akinobu Taketomi

摘要

Purpose

To compare the safety of the medial and inferior approaches in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and assess their suitability for early career surgeons.

Methods

In this multicenter cohort study, 289 patients who underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy at 21 institutions were analyzed using propensity score matching. The outcomes of the medial and inferior approaches were compared in the overall cohort and in cases performed by early career surgeons (≤ 12 postgraduate years).

Results

In the overall cohort (medial, n = 119; inferior, n = 170), no significant differences were observed in the intraoperative or postoperative complication rates, operative time, or blood loss. Among early career surgeons (medial, n = 42; inferior, n = 99), the medial approach was associated with a lower incidence of postoperative complications (OR 0.25; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.93; p = 0.037) and a shorter operative time (β = -21.75 min, 95% CI -40.57 to -0.94; p = 0.040).

Conclusion

For early career surgeons, the medial approach was associated with a lower risk of postoperative complications and a shorter operative time. These findings support the educational value of this technique and suggest that prioritizing it in early surgical training may enhance perioperative safety and inform surgical training curricula.