Objective <p>To evaluate the outcomes of the bipedicle kite flap for coverage of thumb soft tissue defects and to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the flap.</p> Materials and methods <p>This was a retrospective study without a control group. Seventeen soft tissue defects of the thumb in 17 patients were reconstructed using the bipedicle kite flap from May 2016 to October 2024.</p> Results <p>Complete flap survival was achieved in all cases, while venous congestion occurred in 1 of 17 cases. Regarding functional outcomes, the mean Kapandji score was 8.6, and no cases of first web-space contracture were observed. Sensory recovery was observed in all flaps, with a mean static two-point discrimination of 12.2&#xa0;mm. Fifteen of 17 cases achieved complete cortical reorientation. At the donor site, 4 of 17 cases (23.5%) demonstrated limitation of proximal interphalangeal joint flexion, with a mean decrease in range of motion of 16.3 degrees compared with the contralateral side.</p> Conclusion <p>The flap appears to be a reliable option for coverage of thumb soft tissue defects, with complete flap survival and no significant limitation in pedicle length. However, decreased range of motion of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the donor finger was observed in 23.5% of cases.</p> Level of evidence <p>Level IV.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Advantages and disadvantages of bipedicle kite flap for covering soft tissue defects of the thumb

  • Viet Tan Nguyen,
  • Thai Hung Ngo

摘要

Objective

To evaluate the outcomes of the bipedicle kite flap for coverage of thumb soft tissue defects and to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the flap.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective study without a control group. Seventeen soft tissue defects of the thumb in 17 patients were reconstructed using the bipedicle kite flap from May 2016 to October 2024.

Results

Complete flap survival was achieved in all cases, while venous congestion occurred in 1 of 17 cases. Regarding functional outcomes, the mean Kapandji score was 8.6, and no cases of first web-space contracture were observed. Sensory recovery was observed in all flaps, with a mean static two-point discrimination of 12.2 mm. Fifteen of 17 cases achieved complete cortical reorientation. At the donor site, 4 of 17 cases (23.5%) demonstrated limitation of proximal interphalangeal joint flexion, with a mean decrease in range of motion of 16.3 degrees compared with the contralateral side.

Conclusion

The flap appears to be a reliable option for coverage of thumb soft tissue defects, with complete flap survival and no significant limitation in pedicle length. However, decreased range of motion of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the donor finger was observed in 23.5% of cases.

Level of evidence

Level IV.