Scholarlink

Study design <p>Meta-analysis.</p> Objective <p>This meta-analysis aims to clarify the clinical and functional impact of Workers’ compensation (WC) status on cervical spine surgery outcomes.</p> Background <p>Work-related musculoskeletal disorders can lead to significant disability, impaired productivity, and quality of life. WC status in patients has been linked to worse outcomes following orthopedic surgeries, including cervical spine procedures (ACDF, CDA). Studies analyzing the influence of WC claims on different cervical spine surgeries report contradicting results.</p> Methods <p>Adhering to the PRISMA guidelines, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and PubMed were searched since inception until May 2025. The data that was extracted included overall complications, number of reoperations, surgery-related outcomes (estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, and length of stay (LOS)), the improvement in patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) at 1&#xa0;year post-operatively, number of patients returning to work, and mean time to return to work.</p> Results <p>Eight retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria, including 801 patients in the WC group and 1102 in the NWC group. The patients in the WC group had a shorter operative time (Mean difference = − 2.83 min; 95% CI − 5.03 to − 0.64, <i>p</i> = 0.01), and LOS (Mean difference = − 2.62 h; 95% CI − 4.61 to − 0.63, <i>p</i> = 0.01). On the other hand, they had a worse improvement in neck pain (Standardized mean difference  = − 0.32; 95% CI − 0.45 to − 0.19, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and arm pain (Standardized mean difference = − 0.26; 95% CI − 0.39 to − 0.13, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), as well as a longer time to return to work (Mean difference = 4.53&#xa0;weeks; 95% CI 2.70–6.36, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p> Conclusion <p>Patients with WC claims had worse improvement in arm and neck pain and needed more time to return to work. These results highlight the impact of WC claims have on cervical spine surgery outcomes, making compensation status an essential factor to consider in clinical evaluation and patient counseling.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The impact of workers’ compensation claims on outcomes of cervical spine surgery: a meta-analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月6日

查看全文
  • Ralph Maroun,
  • Mohammad Daher,
  • Ethan Cottrill,
  • Bryan Youssef,
  • Yorgho Maalouf,
  • Moussa Samaha,
  • Richard K. Hurley,
  • William F. Lavelle,
  • Peter G. Passias,
  • Bassel Diebo,
  • Amer Sebaaly,
  • Alan H. Daniels

摘要

Study design

Meta-analysis.

Objective

This meta-analysis aims to clarify the clinical and functional impact of Workers’ compensation (WC) status on cervical spine surgery outcomes.

Background

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders can lead to significant disability, impaired productivity, and quality of life. WC status in patients has been linked to worse outcomes following orthopedic surgeries, including cervical spine procedures (ACDF, CDA). Studies analyzing the influence of WC claims on different cervical spine surgeries report contradicting results.

Methods

Adhering to the PRISMA guidelines, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and PubMed were searched since inception until May 2025. The data that was extracted included overall complications, number of reoperations, surgery-related outcomes (estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, and length of stay (LOS)), the improvement in patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) at 1 year post-operatively, number of patients returning to work, and mean time to return to work.

Results

Eight retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria, including 801 patients in the WC group and 1102 in the NWC group. The patients in the WC group had a shorter operative time (Mean difference = − 2.83 min; 95% CI − 5.03 to − 0.64, p = 0.01), and LOS (Mean difference = − 2.62 h; 95% CI − 4.61 to − 0.63, p = 0.01). On the other hand, they had a worse improvement in neck pain (Standardized mean difference  = − 0.32; 95% CI − 0.45 to − 0.19, p < 0.001), and arm pain (Standardized mean difference = − 0.26; 95% CI − 0.39 to − 0.13, p < 0.001), as well as a longer time to return to work (Mean difference = 4.53 weeks; 95% CI 2.70–6.36, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Patients with WC claims had worse improvement in arm and neck pain and needed more time to return to work. These results highlight the impact of WC claims have on cervical spine surgery outcomes, making compensation status an essential factor to consider in clinical evaluation and patient counseling.