Scholarlink

Purpose <p>Endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-LIF) is increasingly used as a minimally invasive alternative to conventional MIS-TLIF. While recent systematic reviews have shown comparable clinical and radiographic outcomes, the learning curve for Endo-LIF has not been systematically synthesised. We aimed to evaluate the learning curve of Endo-LIF, determine how many cases are required to achieve proficiency, and assess the impact of surgeon experience on perioperative outcomes.</p> Methods <p>A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies reporting learning-curve analyses of endoscopic lumbar fusion, including Endo-TLIF, ULIF, and UBE-TLIF. Learning-curve methods included cumulative sum (CUSUM), risk-adjusted CUSUM (RA-CUSUM), and chronological grouping. Outcomes included operative time, complications, radiation exposure, fusion, and defined proficiency thresholds.</p> Results <p>Six retrospective cohort studies involving 653 patients were included. Proficiency thresholds ranged from approximately 19 to over 40 cases, with higher thresholds consistently identified when safety-adjusted (RA-CUSUM) rather than time-based methods were used. Operative time and radiation exposure decreased with experience, and learning-sensitive complications clustered early. Fusion rates and patient-reported outcomes were generally stable throughout the learning curve.</p> Conclusions <p>Endo-LIF demonstrates a clinically meaningful learning curve. Operative efficiency improves early, but safety stabilises later, particularly when risk-adjusted methods are applied. Training and credentialing should therefore be guided by safety-based performance metrics rather than operative time alone.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

How many cases to proficiency? A systematic review of the learning curve in endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月27日

查看全文
  • Chinedu Egu,
  • Hussein Akil,
  • Thomas Clarke,
  • Efeoghene Odjadjare,
  • Neel Badhe,
  • Gloria Etim,
  • Jordana Blackwood,
  • Khalid Salem,
  • Nasir A. Quraishi,
  • Elie Najjar

摘要

Purpose

Endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-LIF) is increasingly used as a minimally invasive alternative to conventional MIS-TLIF. While recent systematic reviews have shown comparable clinical and radiographic outcomes, the learning curve for Endo-LIF has not been systematically synthesised. We aimed to evaluate the learning curve of Endo-LIF, determine how many cases are required to achieve proficiency, and assess the impact of surgeon experience on perioperative outcomes.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies reporting learning-curve analyses of endoscopic lumbar fusion, including Endo-TLIF, ULIF, and UBE-TLIF. Learning-curve methods included cumulative sum (CUSUM), risk-adjusted CUSUM (RA-CUSUM), and chronological grouping. Outcomes included operative time, complications, radiation exposure, fusion, and defined proficiency thresholds.

Results

Six retrospective cohort studies involving 653 patients were included. Proficiency thresholds ranged from approximately 19 to over 40 cases, with higher thresholds consistently identified when safety-adjusted (RA-CUSUM) rather than time-based methods were used. Operative time and radiation exposure decreased with experience, and learning-sensitive complications clustered early. Fusion rates and patient-reported outcomes were generally stable throughout the learning curve.

Conclusions

Endo-LIF demonstrates a clinically meaningful learning curve. Operative efficiency improves early, but safety stabilises later, particularly when risk-adjusted methods are applied. Training and credentialing should therefore be guided by safety-based performance metrics rather than operative time alone.