<p>We consider classes of codimension two Cohen–Macaulay ideals of a standard graded polynomial ring over a field. We revisit Vasconcelos’ problem on <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(3\times 2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> <mo>×</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> matrices with homogeneous entries and, in a different angle, discuss the homological side of Geramita’s work on plane points, with additional regard to the related free resolutions and Rees algebras. An additional topic is the homological discussion of minors fixing a submatrix in the context of a perfect codimension two ideal. A combinatorial outcome of the results is a proof of the conjecture on the Jacobian ideal of a hyperplane arrangement stated by Burity, Simis and Tohǎneanu. The basic drive behind the present landscapes is a thorough analysis of the related Hilbert–Burch matrix, often without assuming equigeneration or linear presentation, not even the popular <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(G_d\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>G</mi> <mi>d</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> condition of Artin–Nagata.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Cohen–Macaulay Ideals of Codimension Two and the Geometry of Plane Points

  • Geisa Gama,
  • Dayane Lira,
  • Zaqueu Ramos,
  • Aron Simis

摘要

We consider classes of codimension two Cohen–Macaulay ideals of a standard graded polynomial ring over a field. We revisit Vasconcelos’ problem on \(3\times 2\) 3 × 2 matrices with homogeneous entries and, in a different angle, discuss the homological side of Geramita’s work on plane points, with additional regard to the related free resolutions and Rees algebras. An additional topic is the homological discussion of minors fixing a submatrix in the context of a perfect codimension two ideal. A combinatorial outcome of the results is a proof of the conjecture on the Jacobian ideal of a hyperplane arrangement stated by Burity, Simis and Tohǎneanu. The basic drive behind the present landscapes is a thorough analysis of the related Hilbert–Burch matrix, often without assuming equigeneration or linear presentation, not even the popular \(G_d\) G d condition of Artin–Nagata.