<p>We are concerned with the existence of solution of the problem where <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Delta ^H_pu=\hbox {div }(a(\nabla u))\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mi>H</mi> </msubsup> <mi>u</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mtext>div</mtext> <mspace width="0.333333em" /> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>a</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, with <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(a(\xi )=H^{p-1}(\xi )\nabla H(\xi ),\, \xi \in \mathbb {R}^N,\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>ξ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mi>H</mi> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>ξ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mi> <mi>H</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>ξ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mi>ξ</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>N</mi> </msup> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(N\geqslant 3,\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mo>⩾</mo> <mn>3</mn> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is the anisotropic <i>p</i>-Laplacian with <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(1&lt;p&lt;N\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\lambda &gt;0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>λ</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is a parameter, and <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(p&lt; q&lt;p^*=pN/(N-p)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi>q</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <msup> <mi>p</mi> <mo>∗</mo> </msup> <mo>=</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>N</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Further, <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Omega \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is a <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(C^1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi>C</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> bounded domain inside a convex open cone. To succeed with a variational approach, where the strong convergence of a bounded (PS) subsequence needs to be proved, one has to deal with anisotropic norms in the absence of a Tartar’s type inequality, unlike the isotropic <i>p</i>-Laplace case. This is overcome by proving the a.e. convergence of its gradients. Furthermore, the solution of (<i>P</i>) is shown to belong to <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(C^{1,\alpha }(\Omega )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msup> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>α</mi> </mrow> </msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> from classical elliptic regularity theory, and is positive from a Harnack inequality, since any solution of (<i>P</i>) is bounded. This in turn is a consequence of a result we prove which assures that any <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(W^{1,p}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi>W</mi> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-solution of critical Neumann problems with the anisotropic <i>p</i>-Laplacian operator on bounded Lipschitz domains in <InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {R}^N\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>N</mi> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> <InlineEquation ID="IEq18"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((N\geqslant 3)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>N</mi> <mo>⩾</mo> <mn>3</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is bounded.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A Critical Neumann problem with anisotropic \(p-\)Laplacian

  • Gustavo Ferron Madeira,
  • Olimpio Hiroshi Miyagaki,
  • Alânnio Barbosa Nóbrega

摘要

We are concerned with the existence of solution of the problem where \(\Delta ^H_pu=\hbox {div }(a(\nabla u))\) Δ p H u = div ( a ( u ) ) , with \(a(\xi )=H^{p-1}(\xi )\nabla H(\xi ),\, \xi \in \mathbb {R}^N,\) a ( ξ ) = H p - 1 ( ξ ) H ( ξ ) , ξ R N , \(N\geqslant 3,\) N 3 , is the anisotropic p-Laplacian with \(1<p<N\) 1 < p < N , \(\lambda >0\) λ > 0 is a parameter, and \(p< q<p^*=pN/(N-p)\) p < q < p = p N / ( N - p ) . Further, \(\Omega \) Ω is a \(C^1\) C 1 bounded domain inside a convex open cone. To succeed with a variational approach, where the strong convergence of a bounded (PS) subsequence needs to be proved, one has to deal with anisotropic norms in the absence of a Tartar’s type inequality, unlike the isotropic p-Laplace case. This is overcome by proving the a.e. convergence of its gradients. Furthermore, the solution of (P) is shown to belong to \(C^{1,\alpha }(\Omega )\) C 1 , α ( Ω ) from classical elliptic regularity theory, and is positive from a Harnack inequality, since any solution of (P) is bounded. This in turn is a consequence of a result we prove which assures that any \(W^{1,p}\) W 1 , p -solution of critical Neumann problems with the anisotropic p-Laplacian operator on bounded Lipschitz domains in \(\mathbb {R}^N\) R N \((N\geqslant 3)\) ( N 3 ) is bounded.