<p>We consider the Monge–Kantorovich problem between two random measures. More precisely, given probability measures <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="526_2024_2905_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="133" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathbb {P}}_1,{\mathbb {P}}_2\in {\mathcal {P}}({\mathcal {P}}(M))\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">P</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">P</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>∈</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">P</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">P</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>M</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> on the space <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="526_2024_2905_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="45" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathcal {P}}(M)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">P</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>M</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> of probability measures on a smooth compact manifold, we study the optimal transport problem between <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="526_2024_2905_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathbb {P}}_1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">P</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="526_2024_2905_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathbb {P}}_2 \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">P</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> where the cost function is given by the squared Wasserstein distance <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="526_2024_2905_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="20" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="66" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(W_2^2(\mu ,\nu )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>W</mi> <mn>2</mn> <mn>2</mn> </msubsup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>μ</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>ν</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> between <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="526_2024_2905_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="95" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mu ,\nu \in {\mathcal {P}}(M)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>μ</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>ν</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">P</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>M</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Under appropriate assumptions on <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="526_2024_2905_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathbb {P}}_1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">P</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, we prove that there exists a unique optimal plan and that it takes the form of an optimal map. An extension of this result to cost functions of the form <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="526_2024_2905_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="85" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(h(W_2(\mu ,\nu ))\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>h</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>W</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>μ</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>ν</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, for strictly convex and strictly increasing functions <i>h</i>, is also established. The proofs rely heavily on a recent result of Schiavo (J Funct Anal 278(6):108397, 2020), which establishes a version of Rademacher’s theorem on Wasserstein spaces.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Optimal transport with optimal transport cost: the Monge–Kantorovich problem on Wasserstein spaces

  • Pedram Emami,
  • Brendan Pass

摘要

We consider the Monge–Kantorovich problem between two random measures. More precisely, given probability measures \({\mathbb {P}}_1,{\mathbb {P}}_2\in {\mathcal {P}}({\mathcal {P}}(M))\) P 1 , P 2 P ( P ( M ) ) on the space \({\mathcal {P}}(M)\) P ( M ) of probability measures on a smooth compact manifold, we study the optimal transport problem between \({\mathbb {P}}_1\) P 1 and \({\mathbb {P}}_2 \) P 2 where the cost function is given by the squared Wasserstein distance \(W_2^2(\mu ,\nu )\) W 2 2 ( μ , ν ) between \(\mu ,\nu \in {\mathcal {P}}(M)\) μ , ν P ( M ) . Under appropriate assumptions on \({\mathbb {P}}_1\) P 1 , we prove that there exists a unique optimal plan and that it takes the form of an optimal map. An extension of this result to cost functions of the form \(h(W_2(\mu ,\nu ))\) h ( W 2 ( μ , ν ) ) , for strictly convex and strictly increasing functions h, is also established. The proofs rely heavily on a recent result of Schiavo (J Funct Anal 278(6):108397, 2020), which establishes a version of Rademacher’s theorem on Wasserstein spaces.