Purpose <p>To summarize the impact of exercise interventions on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in childhood cancer survivors (CCS) and determine optimal FITT (Frequency, Intensity, Type, Time) parameters to improve CRF in CCS.</p> Methods <p>Electronic databases Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Central, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus and clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched from inception to 09/04/2025. Reference lists of relevant articles and review papers were manually screened. Studies included CCS &lt; 19 years at diagnosis, undergoing any type of exercise intervention with peak oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2</sub>peak) and/or 6-min walk test (6MWT) distance as outcomes for CRF.</p> Results <p>Ten studies involving 309 participants (55.7% male, 6–23 years) were included. Exercise interventions significantly improved VO<sub>2</sub>peak (<i>n</i> = 6 studies; MD = 4.40 ml/kg/min; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01; 95% CI, [1.86; 6.94]) and 6MWT (<i>n</i> = 5 studies; MD = 53.59 m; <i>p</i> = 0.01; 95% CI, [16.31; 90.88]) compared to usual care in CCS. Meta-regression revealed no significant associations between frequency, intensity, type, time, and VO<sub>2</sub>peak (<i>n</i> = 6) or 6MWT (<i>n</i> = 3).</p> Conclusion <p>Exercise interventions significantly improved CRF in CCS. Due to the limited amount and heterogeneity of included studies, optimal FITT parameters to increase CRF in CCS could not be identified. More randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes are needed to complement existing evidence and increase the robustness of the findings.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Impact of exercise interventions on cardiorespiratory fitness in childhood cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Nel Van Ermengem,
  • Astrid Torrekens,
  • Miek Hornikx,
  • Deveny Vanrusselt,
  • Anne Uyttebroeck,
  • Véronique Cornelissen,
  • Sabine Verschueren

摘要

Purpose

To summarize the impact of exercise interventions on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in childhood cancer survivors (CCS) and determine optimal FITT (Frequency, Intensity, Type, Time) parameters to improve CRF in CCS.

Methods

Electronic databases Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Central, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus and clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched from inception to 09/04/2025. Reference lists of relevant articles and review papers were manually screened. Studies included CCS < 19 years at diagnosis, undergoing any type of exercise intervention with peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) and/or 6-min walk test (6MWT) distance as outcomes for CRF.

Results

Ten studies involving 309 participants (55.7% male, 6–23 years) were included. Exercise interventions significantly improved VO2peak (n = 6 studies; MD = 4.40 ml/kg/min; p < 0.01; 95% CI, [1.86; 6.94]) and 6MWT (n = 5 studies; MD = 53.59 m; p = 0.01; 95% CI, [16.31; 90.88]) compared to usual care in CCS. Meta-regression revealed no significant associations between frequency, intensity, type, time, and VO2peak (n = 6) or 6MWT (n = 3).

Conclusion

Exercise interventions significantly improved CRF in CCS. Due to the limited amount and heterogeneity of included studies, optimal FITT parameters to increase CRF in CCS could not be identified. More randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes are needed to complement existing evidence and increase the robustness of the findings.