Scholarlink

Context <p>To bolster integration of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) into routine practice, a consortium of six cancer centers developed an EHR-integrated electronic symptom management program (eSyM) and deployed it in an institutional randomized stepped-wedge hybrid effectiveness-implementation study involving patients receiving chemotherapy or surgery.</p> Objectives <p>We conducted qualitative interviews with patients and staff after implementing eSyM to understand and compare experiences and perceptions regarding the intervention and barriers/facilitators to ePRO usage in routine oncology practice.</p> Methods <p>We developed semi-structured interview guides for patients and both clinical and non-clinical staff exposed to eSyM. Questions were informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Patients provided consent; a consent waiver was obtained for staff. Interview transcripts were dual-coded and thematically analyzed.</p> Results <p>From September 2020 to March 2024, 79 staff and 14 patients participated in interviews. Staff and patients held similar beliefs regarding eSyM compatibility, communication, and prioritization. Most perceived that eSyM was easy to use and improved communication, but competing demands impeded regular utilization, and deeper engagement was necessary for sustainability. Discordance emerged in the domains of receptivity and technology. Patients were more receptive to eSyM and to using technology than staff perceived.</p> Conclusion <p>Most patients and staff reported that eSyM added value and was easy to navigate. Staff tended to underestimate patients’ receptivity to eSyM. De-prioritization of eSyM could reflect a lack of perceived mutual engagement in or impact from the intervention. Understanding perceived and experienced facilitators and barriers can enable successful implementation of ePRO systems like eSyM to improve cancer care delivery.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Patient and staff experiences with an EHR-Integrated Symptom Management Program (eSyM) in oncology

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月24日

查看全文
  • Christine M. Cronin,
  • Fiona Barrett,
  • Samira Dias,
  • Roshan Paudel,
  • Raymond U. Osarogiagbon,
  • Deb Schrag,
  • Sandra L. Wong,
  • Don S. Dizon,
  • Jessica J. Bian,
  • Hannah W. Hazard-Jenkins,
  • Gabriel A. Brooks,
  • Anna Revette,
  • Michael J. Hassett

摘要

Context

To bolster integration of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) into routine practice, a consortium of six cancer centers developed an EHR-integrated electronic symptom management program (eSyM) and deployed it in an institutional randomized stepped-wedge hybrid effectiveness-implementation study involving patients receiving chemotherapy or surgery.

Objectives

We conducted qualitative interviews with patients and staff after implementing eSyM to understand and compare experiences and perceptions regarding the intervention and barriers/facilitators to ePRO usage in routine oncology practice.

Methods

We developed semi-structured interview guides for patients and both clinical and non-clinical staff exposed to eSyM. Questions were informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Patients provided consent; a consent waiver was obtained for staff. Interview transcripts were dual-coded and thematically analyzed.

Results

From September 2020 to March 2024, 79 staff and 14 patients participated in interviews. Staff and patients held similar beliefs regarding eSyM compatibility, communication, and prioritization. Most perceived that eSyM was easy to use and improved communication, but competing demands impeded regular utilization, and deeper engagement was necessary for sustainability. Discordance emerged in the domains of receptivity and technology. Patients were more receptive to eSyM and to using technology than staff perceived.

Conclusion

Most patients and staff reported that eSyM added value and was easy to navigate. Staff tended to underestimate patients’ receptivity to eSyM. De-prioritization of eSyM could reflect a lack of perceived mutual engagement in or impact from the intervention. Understanding perceived and experienced facilitators and barriers can enable successful implementation of ePRO systems like eSyM to improve cancer care delivery.