<p>In the case of operating conditions in a much shorter time, the accelerated life test models are commonly used method since these models let the experimenters control the higher stress levels to be used for components or items in the life tests. Among different accelerated life test methods, constant stress accelerated life test models have a relationship between “failure time” and “stress” and these models are quite popular since they help the experimenters save time and cost. In this study, we evaluate the performances of the parameter estimations of the two-parameter bathtub-shaped lifetime distribution introduced by Chen (Stat Probab Lett 49(2):155–161, 2000) under the constant stress accelerated life test model using the well-known eight different inference methods. Then, we investigate the optimal stress levels using some popular criteria. Then, the performances of the estimations are compared with simulation schemes. Simulation results showed that the maximum likelihood method provides better estimation performances than others. The estimation performances of the other methods can be changed according to the stress level of the accelerated life test model. Further, it is observed that increasing stress levels provide optimal accelerated life test schemes under fixed first stress levels. Finally, we use a real data example to illustrate the theoretical outcomes.</p>